Kundan Mahto Son of Indrashan Mahto vs State Of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Pat) 869

RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Kundan Mahto Son of Indrashan Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Udit Narain Singh, Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, Mr. Anshuman Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.

The appellant has preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. putting to challenge the judgment of conviction dated 14.12.2017 and the order of sentence dated 19.12.2017, passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge POCSO Act, East Champaran, Motihari, in POCSO Trial No. 25 of 2017 (arising out of Sugauli P.S. Case No. 326 of 2013), whereby the sole appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:-

Convicted under Sections	Sentence
Convicted under Sections	Imprisonment	Fine(Rs.)	In default of fine
376(2)(f)(i)of the IPC	RI for Life	10.000/-	SI for two months
4 of POCSO Act	RI for Life	10.000/	SI for two months

2. Both the sentences have been ordered to run concurrently.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, after some arguments, has submitted that without entering into the legality of the finding of conviction recorded by the trial court, this Court may with compassion consider the appellant's case on the point of sentence. He has submitted that the appellant has already r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Pat) 869

RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGHKundan Mahto Son of Indrashan Mahto – AppellantVersusState Of Bihar – Respondent

RAJESH KUMAR VERMA, CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Kundan Mahto Son of Indrashan Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent