Back
PURNENDU SINGH
Municipal Corporation Purnea – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Building Tribunal-1 Bihar, Patna – Respondent
Purnendu Singh, J. – Heard Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, learned counsel for the respondent no.2.
2. The petitioner has filed the writ application for the following reliefs: –
(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, for quashing the Order dated 01/09/2023 passed in Appeal No. 11 (N)/2022 (hereinafter referred as "impugned order") by learned Court of Bihar Municipal Building Tribunal,- 1, Bihar, Patna (hereinafter referred as "learned Tribunal"), whereby and whereunder. Order dated 02/11/2022 passed in Vigilance Case No.01/2022 23 by Municipal Commissioner, Purnea and the Letter No. 2591 dated 12/08/2023 issued by Municipal Commissioner, Purnea, has been stayed till further order - which has effect of giving final relief itself to respondent no.2 itself, without there being any final adjudication on merits as he would start construction, which has been stopped by the learned Municipal Commissioner, Purnea, as it was found to be against the provisions of Bihar Building bye-laws, 2014.
(ii) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamu, directing and commanding upon the
Constructions raised in violation and disobedience of the interim orders of the court cannot be permitted to remain in existence. To uphold the majesty of law, the acts done by the petitioners in dis....
An order affecting a person's rights is effective only when communicated, starting the limitation period from that date, not the date of the order itself.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
