P. B. BAJANTHRI, RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
Shailendra Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
P. B. Bajanthri, J. –
I.A. No.1 of 2020.
Heard I.A. No.1 of 2020 arising out of L.P.A. No.186 of 2020. Respondents have not filed objection to I.A. No.1 of 2020 for condonation of delay. Further taking note of the pleadings in I.A. No.1 of 2020 for condonation of delay of 190 days, we are satisfied with reasons to condone the delay of 190 days. Accordingly, I.A. No.1 of 2020 stands allowed while condoning the delay of 190 days in filing the present L.P.A.
L.P.A. No.186 of 2020:
2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties, main matter (L.P.A. No.186 of 2020) is taken up for final disposal.
3. The appellant was holding the post of Deputy Development Commissioner. He was appointed to State Cadre, namely, Bihar State Service Administration. He was placed under suspension on 26.03.2010 on certain alleged allegation. He was subjected to departmental inquiry under Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 2005 (for short ‘C.C.A. Rules, 2005’) on 04.02.2011. The appellant’s explanation to the charge memo was not satisfied and it was resulted in holding of departmental inquiry by appointing Inquiring and Presenting Officers. The Inquiring Offi
Bihar State Electricity Boad vs. Sharda Prasad Sinha
Dhirendra Prasad Shrivastava vs. State of Bihar
Divisional Controller, KSRTC vs. Mahadeva Shetty
Government of Andhra Pradesh vs. B. Satyanarayana Rao
Thota Shesharathnamma vs. Thota Manikyamma (Dead) by Legal Represenatives
State of U.P. vs. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. (1991) 4 SCC 139 – Relied.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.