SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 981

ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Sudheshwar Sah – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Ranjeet Kumar, Kundan Kumar.
For the Respondent: M/s Madhaw Prasad, GP 23, Arvind Kumar, AC to GP 23.

Anil Kumar Sinha, J. – The present writ application has been filed by the petitioner for setting aside the order of punishment, as contained in Memo No. 8/vk-05-37/2014 931, dated 01.12.2020, issued by the Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, whereby 100 per cent pension of the petitioner has been withheld and further it has been ordered that he shall be entitled for subsistence allowance from the date of suspension till his superannuation, i.e., from 01.04.2014 to 31.01.2017 and from 01.02.2017 till the date of passing of the impugned order, the petitioner shall be entitled for provisional pension along with leave encashment.

2. The brief facts, giving rise to the present writ application, is that at the relevant point of time, the petitioner was posted as Block Education Officer in the District of Samastipur. One Sunil Kumar lodged a complaint with the Vigilance Investigation Bureau, alleging that the petitioner was demanding Rs. 50,000/- for himself as well as for District Programme Officer for submitting favorable report for upgradation of a school, namely, Upgraded Middle School, situated at Village- Silaut, Pokhraira, in the district o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top