RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
Jyoti Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.—This revision application has been preferred for setting aside the order dated 11.04.2018 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned order’ or ‘impugned judgment’) passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur in Maintenance Case No. 153 of 2016. By the impugned order, the learned Family Court has been pleased to grant maintenance of a sum of Rs. 10,000/- in total, being Rs. 5,000/- per month for maintenance of the petitioner and Rs. 5,000/- per month for maintenance and education of her minor son. The Opposite Party No.2 has been directed to pay the maintenance per month after deducting the amount, if any, which he has been paying at any other forum, from the date of filing of the application.
Brief facts of the case
2. Petitioner was married to Opposite Party No.2 on 29.11.2012 in accordance with the Hindu rites and customs. It is alleged that sometimes after her marriage, the behavior of the husband changed and he started committing atrocities upon the petitioner. The petitioner gave birth to a child but during the pregnancy period, because her husband was not taking care of her, she returned to her naihar. It is alleged that afte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.