SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 1055

P. B. BAJANTHRI, JITENDRA KUMAR
Savita Mandal – Appellant
Versus
Nakshtra Kumar Mandal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha.
For the Respondent: Mr. Jibendra Mishra.

Jitendra Kumar, J.—The present appeal has been filed impugning the judgment dated 12.01.2017, passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Katihar, in Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No. 413 of 2013. This petition was filed under Section 13 (1)(I-B) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 praying for divorce and custody of two minor children born out of wedlock. However, the petition was dismissed on contest.

2. The case of the Appellant-Plaintiff, as per the pleadings is that the marriage between the Appellant-Plaintiff and the Respondent-Defendant was solemnized on 25.09.1998 as per the Hindu rites and customs. After marriage, the Appellant-wife joined the matrimonial home of the Respondent-husband. It is further pleaded that at the time of marriage, lavish gifts besides cash of j 1.5 lacs towards expenses of the marriage were given to the Respondent-husband. After the marriage, the conjugal life between the parties was cordial and two male children, namely, Priyansu Kumar and Saket Kumar were born out of the wedlock, who were 12 years and 10 years old respectively at the time filing of the divorce petition. It is further pleaded that after the birth of younger child, the Respon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top