SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 985

P. B. BAJANTHRI, JITENDRA KUMAR
Nisha Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Uday Chand Gupta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sudish Kumar.
For the Respondent: Mr. Shashank Chandra.

Jitendra Kumar, J. – The present appeal has been filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 impugning the judgment dated 07.10.2017, passed by Ld. Principal Judge, Family Court, Nalanda at Biharsharif in Divorce Case No. 72 of 2008, whereby the petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act on 29.07.2008, praying for decree of divorce dissolving the marriage between the parties, has been allowed dissolving the marriage between the parties by decree of divorce.

2. The case of the Respondent-Plaintiff, as per the pleadings, is that the Respondent-Plaintiff was married with the Appellant-Defendant on 10th July, 1987 as per Hindu rites and customs. Since the marriage, they lived together as husband and wife and out of wedlock two sons were born. The elder son, namely, Narendra Bharti was born on 16th May, 1991 and the younger son, namely Aditya Kumar was born on 15th of August, 1998. It is further averred that after birth of second son, the nature of the Appellant-Defendant-wife got completely changed and she always used to quarrel with the old mother of the Respondent-Plaintiff-husband. It is further averred that she used to leave her husband’s house without an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top