SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 67

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, RAJIV ROY
Vikas Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Nand Kishore Singh (in both).
For the Respondents: Mr. Piyush Lall (in both).

Rajiv Roy, J.—Two writ petitions have been preferred by the petitioner. The first writ petition being CWJC No. 4937 of 2011 has been preferred for the grant of following reliefs:—

(i) to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order passed on administrative side by the Standing Committee of Hon'ble Patna High Court under Rule 43b of Bihar Pension Rules 1950, whereby and where under 5% pension admissible to Petitioner has been deducted for ever and period of suspension has been directed to be treated as such', communicated under memo no. 14452 dated 25.09.10;

(ii) to issue a consequential writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent authorities to treat the period of suspension of the Petitioner on duty for all practical purposes and grant all its consequential benefits flowing out of the same i.e. to pay full salary together with admissible allowances i.e. D.A. M.A. HRA, sumptuary allowance, fuel allowance, newspaper allowance, library allowance etc;

(iii) to issue further a consequential writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent authorities to count the period of suspension for calculating pension together with earn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top