K. VINOD CHANDRAN, RAJIV ROY
Vikas Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Rajiv Roy, J.—Two writ petitions have been preferred by the petitioner. The first writ petition being CWJC No. 4937 of 2011 has been preferred for the grant of following reliefs:—
(i) to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order passed on administrative side by the Standing Committee of Hon'ble Patna High Court under Rule 43b of Bihar Pension Rules 1950, whereby and where under 5% pension admissible to Petitioner has been deducted for ever and period of suspension has been directed to be treated as such', communicated under memo no. 14452 dated 25.09.10;
(ii) to issue a consequential writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent authorities to treat the period of suspension of the Petitioner on duty for all practical purposes and grant all its consequential benefits flowing out of the same i.e. to pay full salary together with admissible allowances i.e. D.A. M.A. HRA, sumptuary allowance, fuel allowance, newspaper allowance, library allowance etc;
(iii) to issue further a consequential writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent authorities to count the period of suspension for calculating pension together with earn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.