Amar Kumar @ Aman Kumar Son of Kusheshwar Paswan VS State Of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, RAJIV ROY
Amar Kumar @ Aman Kumar Son of Kusheshwar Paswan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Ram Naresh Rai, Miss. Akrity Aishwarya, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr.Sri Dilip Kumar Sinha, Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar, Mr. Raj Krishna Jha, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, J.

This appeal has been preferred by the sole appellant under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C. for short), putting to challenge the impugned judgment of conviction dated 12.10.2018 and the order of sentence dated 25.10.2018, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-X, Patna, in Sessions Trial No.469 of 2016, arising out of Ramkrishna Nagar P.S. Case No.61 of 2015, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:

Conviction under Section	Sentence
	Imprisonment	Fine (Rs.)	In default of fine
under Sections, 363, 365 and 364(A) of the IPC.	Imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 364A of the IPC. No separate sentence for other proved offence.	50,000/-	SI for 6 months

2. We have heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as also Mr. Arvind Kumar Mouar, learned counsel for the informant.

3. The criminal case was set in motion with the informant (PW.4) furnishing a written report to the Officer-in-Charge, Ramkrishna Nagar Police

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, RAJIV ROYAmar Kumar @ Aman Kumar Son of Kusheshwar Paswan – AppellantVersusState Of Bihar – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, RAJIV ROY
Amar Kumar @ Aman Kumar Son of Kusheshwar Paswan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent