SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Pat) 1143

ANSHUMAN
Awadhesh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M/s Shekhar Singh, Sumit Kumar, Avinash Kumar.
For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, (AC to GA-10).

Dr. Anshuman, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the name of the petitioner has wrongly been typed in the petition as ‘Awadesh’ whereas his correct name is ‘Awadhesh’. He is permitted to correct the same in the course of the day. Office is directed to correct the name of the parties everywhere in the soft and hard copy.

3. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing of the order communicated by letter No. 535 (15) dated 31.08.2015 issued by Joint Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, by which the review application has been rejected. The further prayer has been made for setting aside the order of punishment contained in notification No. 578 (15) dated 06.04.2011 issued under the signature of Joint Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna, by which the petitioner has been awarded the punishment of reprimand, stoppage of five increments with cumulative effect and nothing is payable except the substantial allowances for the period of suspension (excluding the period of custody). The further prayer has been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top