SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 130

ARVIND SRIVASTAVA, SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Narayan Sah – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Subhro Sanyal.
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, APP.

Sunil Dutta Mishra, J. – Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This appeal has been preferred by the aforesaid appellants under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of conviction dated 29.06.1996 and order of sentence dated 01.07.1996 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Madhepura in Sessions Trial No. 136 of 1989 whereby and whereunder appellants, namely, Narain Sah, Yogendra Sah, Hari Nandan Sah and Shambhu Sah have been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred as I.P.C). They have also been convicted under Sections 323, 147 and 447 of I.P.C. The appellants have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and it was ordered that the period of imprisonment undergone during investigation and trial of the case shall be set off.

3. The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 11th June, 1987 at about 6:00 a.m. the informant Sukh Sagar Paswan along with his brother Raj Kishore Paswan (deceased) and bullocks reached at his field to plough his field. His brother Raj Kishore Paswan started tilling his land and the inf

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top