Ashutosh Kumar, J. – Heard Mr. Mrigank Mauli, the learned Senior Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad, the learned Senior Advocate for respondent No. 11.

2. The State is represented by Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwari, the learned A.C. to A.A.G.-13.

3. This appeal is against the order dated 28.08.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 17523 of 2019, whereby the writ petition was dismissed in view of the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kalpana Rani vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.; 2014 (2) PLJR 665 [: 2014 (3) BLJ 91].

4. Since the order was very cryptic, the appeal was first entertained on 14.12.2021, when the Bench hearing the matter found that the appeal needed to be allowed inter alia for various reasons but primarily for the reason of the order under challenge to be non-speaking. Nonetheless, the matter was adjourned for a further hearing.

5. In Kalpana Rani (supra), it has been held by the Full Bench in paragraph 106 as hereunder: –

“106. A question, therefore, would arise as to whether in term of the repeal of the executive instruction of Panchayat Shiksha Mitra in terms of Rule 20(i) of 2006 Rules, could any dispute be adjudicated for appointment on the post of Panchayat Shiks