Rahul Singh vs State of Bihar - 2024 Supreme(Pat) 580

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Pat) 580

ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Rahul Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Petitioners: M/s Kumar Kaushik (in 10669); Sanjay Kumar(in 10671, 10673, 10829, 10830, 10831); Meena Kumari(in 10673).
For the State : M/s P. K. Shahi, AG Anukriti Jaipuriyar, AC to AG (in 10669, 10671, 10830, 10831); Sarvesh Kumar, GP 24 (in 10829).
For the Respondents: Mr. Standing Counsel 8(in 10673).
For the BSUSC : M/s Harsh Singh (in 10669, 10673, 10830, 10831); Rakesh Kumar Singh (in 10671); Binod Jee Verma (in 10673).

Anil Kumar Sinha, J.—Since common question of fact and law has been raised in all these six writ applications, as such, all writ applications are heard together and are being disposed by a common order.

2. These writ applications have been filed by the petitioners for setting aside the notice, dated 04.07.2024 (Annexure P 9 to CWJC No. 10669 of 2024), by which the respondent-Bihar State University Service Commission has shortlisted the candidates for calling them for the purpose of interview on the basis of marks obtained by them under educational qualifications as per the parameters given in the Advertisement No. AP-MATH-23/20-21, dated 21.09.2020, for appointment as Assistant Professors in different Universities of Bihar in different subjects.

3. The petitioners have further prayed for a direction to the Bihar State University Service Commission (in short, ‘the Commission’) to allow them to appear in the interview, to be started from 22.07.2024 to 26.07.2024, and thereafter to publish the final merit list in their respective subjects on the basis of their performance in the educational qualification and interview.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners, referring to Clause 7 of the