RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, SHAILENDRA SINGH
Niraj Yadav @ Niraj Kumar Chaudhri – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Shailendra Singh, J.—Heard Mr. Y.V. Giri, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Devashish Giri, learned Counsel for the appellants and Mr. Ajay Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The instant criminal appeal has been filed by the appellants against the judgment of conviction dated 06.06.2016 and order of sentence dated 13.06.2016 passed by the court of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea in Sessions Case No. 417 of 2015/Trial No. 376 of 2015 arising out of K. Hat P.S. Case No. 517 of 2015 whereby and whereunder the learned trial court convicted the appellants for the offences punishable under Sections 364A, 302, 120B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’). The appellants have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) each for the offence under Section 364A of IPC. They have been further ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh) each for the offence under Section 302 of IPC. They have been also ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) each for t
Paramsivam vs. State through Inspector of Police
Sucha Singh vs. State of Panjab
State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Jeet Singh
Lochan Shrivas vs. State of Chhatishgarh
State of W.B. vs. Mir Mohammad Omar
Shambhu Das Alias Bijoy Das vs. State of Assam
Chotkau vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Hari Prasad @ Kishan Sahu vs. State of Chhattishgarh
Manga Alias Man Singh vs. State of Uttarakhand
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra
Sunil Kumar Jha @ Sunil Jha vs. State of Bihar
Meharaj Singh vs. State of U.P.
Laxmibai (dead) Thr. L.Rs. vs. Bhagwantbuva (dead) Thr. L.Rs.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; lapses in investigation and reliance on questionable evidence necessitate acquittal.
The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and failure to examine the Investigating Officer can result in significant prejudice to the accused, as demonstrated in this case.
Delay in FIR and pre-FIR inquest not vitiating trial absent prejudice; reliable natural witness testimony, corroborated by medical/weapon evidence, suffices for murder conviction despite inconclusive....
Conviction for murder by unlawful assembly sustainable on reliable sole eyewitness to killing, corroborated by medical evidence and abduction witnesses, despite FIR delay, witness non-examination, an....
The court upheld the conviction based on circumstantial evidence, establishing a clear motive and reliable witness testimonies linking the appellant to the murder.
Criminal Law – Appeal against conviction – Theory of last seen – Reliability of - The last seen theory comes into play where the time gap between point of time when Accused and deceased were seen las....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.