G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. , through the, Law Officer, Bishnudeo Prasad Gupta, son of Sri Kant Lal Sah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar, through Additional District Magistrate – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J.)
1. The North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited is the petitioner who has challenged the order of the appellate authority dated 30.05.2014 with the specific contention that it is passed without following the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, Bihar State Electricity Supply Code, 2007 and therefore, the same is liable to be set aside.
2. The grounds raised by the petitioner are that the appellate authority has entertained the time barred appeal without any application for condonation of delay or without any discretion on the aspect of the delay, though the same was raised by the Board i.e. the petitioner.
3. It is the specific contention of the Learned counsel for the petitioner that as per the provisions under section 126 (1) of the Electricity Act, 2003, provisional assessment has been made by the Assessing Officer and a punitive appeal of Rs 5,28,795/- was served to the respondent No. 3 vide letter no. 300 dated 02.02.2013 through registered post and he was asked to file objection, if any, under section 126(3) of the Electricity Act. Accordingly, respondent No. 3 has filed his objections dated 08.02.2013. After following the due p
Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission And Ors.
The appellate authority cannot entertain an appeal filed beyond the statutory time limit of 30 days as per the Electricity Act, 2003.
The requirement for deposit of 50% of the assessed amount under the Electricity Act does not share the same limitation period as the appeal, allowing for a reasonable delay in deposit.
The court clarified that a late deposit of the assessed amount does not bar an appeal if filed within the statutory limitation period, emphasizing a purposive interpretation of the law.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the limitation period for filing appeals under the Electricity Act, 2003.
The availability of an alternative remedy under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003 must be pursued, barring exceptional circumstances justifying writ jurisdiction.
The court established that the burden of proof lies on the consumer to demonstrate the actual period of unauthorized electricity use to challenge assessments under Section 126(5).
Court recognizes statutory appeal as a remedy against assessment order under Electricity Act.
The court established the principle that a litigant's procedural missteps should not preclude them from having their substantive rights considered by the appropriate appellate forum.
The court held that a partial payment is necessary to entertain an appeal against an electricity assessment bill.
The court reinforced that a writ petition is not maintainable when an efficacious alternative remedy exists under the Electricity Act, emphasizing adherence to due process and natural justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.