SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 614

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA, JJ.
Arun Kumar, S/o. Gangapati Malik and Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar and Ors. – Respondents
Letters Patent Appeal No.685 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3846 of 2017 with Letters Patent Appeal No. 628 of 2021 with Letters Patent Appeal No. 629 of 2021 with Letters Patent Appeal No. 649 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.718 of 2019 with Letters Patent Appeal No. 673 of 2021.
Decided On : 08-07-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Singh, Senior Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwari, Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate, Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, Advocate

The court affirmed that teachers on deputation cannot claim regularization in the Research and Training cadre under the Bihar Education Service Rules, 2014, as they were not appointed in the sub-cadre.

Headnote:(A) Bihar Education Service Rules, 2014 - Rule 26(4) and Rule 27 - Appointment and deputation of teachers - Appellants, appointed as Assistant Teachers, challenged rejection of their claim for inclusion in Research and Training cadre - Court held that appellants were on deputation and not entitled to regularization under the Rules - Dismissed appeals. (Paras 11, 13, 14)

(B) Interpretation of Statutory Rules - The court emphasized that individuals on deputation cannot claim regularization unless appointed as per the statutory provisions. (Paras 13.1, 13.2)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were appointed as Assistant Teachers and later empanelled for positions in Training Colleges. They claimed inclusion in the Research and Training cadre after the Rules of 2014 were notified, but their applications were rejected on grounds of being on deputation.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the appellants were correctly classified as being on deputation and thus not eligible for inclusion in the sub-cadre as per the Rules.

Issues: The main issues were the interpretation of Rules 26(4) and 27 regarding the status of the appellants as deputationists versus regular appointees.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the appellants, being on deputation, were not entitled to the benefits of regularization under the Rules, affirming the learned Single Judge's decision.

Result: Appeals dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

(Vipul M. Pancholi, J.)

The present appeals have been filed under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the Patna High Court Rules against common oral judgment dated 01.10.2021 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3846 of 2017 and other analogous matters rendered by the learned Single Judge, whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petitions filed by the present appellants/original petitioners.

2. As the issue involved in all these appeals is common, learned counsels appearing for the parties jointly requested that all these appeals be heard together and be disposed of at the admission stage itself.

3. The factual matrix of the present case is as under: -

3.1. It is the case of the appellants/original petitioners that they were appointed as Assistant Teachers on different dates and in different years in different Government Primary and Secondary Schools. They possess the requisite qualifications for the said post. The Research and Training Directorate of Education Department, Government of Bihar, had come out with a notice for preparation of a panel for posting in various District Institutes of Education and Training (DIET), Teachers Training Colleges and Primary Teachers Training Colleges as Principals and Lecturers. For the said purpose, applications were invited from the members of the Bihar Education Service, (Administrative Cadre), Subordinate Education Service Cadre and other Officers and Teachers working in Government Primary, Secondary and Higher Secondary Schools. The said notice prescribed qualification for the aspirants willing to be empanelled in the light of the said notice.

3.2. It is the case of the appellants/original petitioners that their applications for empanellment of 294 applicants including these petitioners were shortlisted.

3.3. It is further stated that the Director (Research and Training) Department of Education requested the Director, Primary Education to handover the services of the Teachers so empanelled to the Research and Training Directorate. Further, the shortlisted candidates were made to participate in a workshop of Development Needs Analysis (‘DNA’) for selection from the shortlisted candidates for deputation in various institutions. Thereafter the workshop of DNA was organized in two stages. The petitioners were relieved to participate in the said DNA and ultimately 170 eligible candidates were declared successful including the petitioners.

3.4. Thereafter, the Education Department, Government of Bihar, issued a letter on 05.06.2013 addressed to all the aspirants to the effect that a total of 170 Teachers had been identified for posting on deputation in Education Training Colleges. Such candidates were allowed to exercise three options for their posting against vacant posts. The case of the petitioners is that they also exercised their options and ultimately a total number of 150 candidates were posted as Lecturers on deputation basis in different District Education and Training Institutes and Primary Teachers Education College for a period of one year by an Office Order dated 23.07.2013. At this stage, it is pertinent to note that in the said letter it was specifically mentioned that selected candidates were being posted on deputation basis and the decision to extend the period of deputation shall depend upon the satisfactory service of the deputed teachers.

3.5. Thereafter, the Bihar Education Service Rules, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules of 2014’) were framed in exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India came to be notified by the Education Department, Government of Bihar, vide Notification No. 698 dated 12.02.2014. The Rules stipulated that the Bihar Education Service shall have four sub-cadres namely (i) Administration Sub-Cadre, (ii) Training Sub-Cadre, (iii) Research and Training Sub-Cadre and (iv) An Isolated Sub-Cadre.

3.6. It is the case of the appellants/original petitioners that even after framing of the Rules of 201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top