Back
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
Priya Ranjan – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Vipul M. Pancholi, J.—The present appeal has been filed under Clause 10, Appendix-E of the Letters Patent Appeal of the Patna High Court Rules against the order dated 04.03.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in Civil Review No. 205 of 2019, whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the review application filed by the appellant. The appellant has also challenged the order dated 14.09.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in CWJC No. 17064 of 2011, whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ application filed by the appellant.
2. Heard Mr. Siddharth Harsh, learned counsel for the appellant and learned Assistant Counsel to AAG-15 for the respondents.
3. The brief facts leading to filing of the present appeal are as under:—
3.1. The present appellant/original writ petitioner preferred CWJC No. 17064 of 2011, wherein the petitioner has stated that he was appointed on vacant post on 27.04.1987 as Assistant Teacher (Biology) in Chaudhary Ram Prasad Sharma Project Girls High School, Pandarak, Patna, by the Managing Committee of the aforesaid school. He was possessing the degree of B.Sc. and thereafter he acquired Senior Teachers Training Degree from the reputed Sister
Teacher training qualification mandatory at appointment time under statutory rules; subsequent acquisition does not validate; executive resolutions cannot override rules.
The court reaffirmed that appointments based on invalid qualifications can be deemed fraudulent and upheld the necessity of proving the legitimacy of educational credentials.
The court established that the State has the authority to set educational qualifications for teachers and that the writ court cannot alter policy decisions unless they are found to be arbitrary or un....
The Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) is a mandatory qualification for all candidates seeking appointment as teachers in elementary education, effective from the notification date of 23.08.2010, and can....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the qualifications required for appointment as a trained Teacher in Secondary School do not necessarily mandate a specific graduation subject,....
Service Matter1 - Under Section 106 of the Schedule “F”, it is nowhere provided that if the appointment of Teacher is made in Non Granted School, then Teacher cannot be given an appointment in the gr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
