SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1358

KHATIM REZA
Som Nath Mukherjee – Appellant
Versus
Atul Kumar Sinha – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. R. S. Ganguly.
For the Opp. Parties : M/s Jitendra Kishore Verma, Shreyash Goyal.

Khatim Reza, J. – Heard Mr. R. S. Ganguly, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kishore Verma assisted by Mr. Shreyash Goyal, learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. This Civil Revision application has been filed under Section 14(8) of the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as BBC Act) against the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2010 passed by learned Munsif- 1st, Darbhanga in Eviciton Suit No. 9 of 2004 by which eviction of the defendant/petitioner has been sought from the suit premises on the ground of personal necessity alone, which was decreed by the learned Munsif- Ist, Darbhanga upon finding that there exists relationship of landlord and tenant between the plaintiff and defendants and that the plaintiff has been able to prove the personal necessity as pleaded and also decided the question of partial eviction in favour of plaintiff.

3. The case of the plaintiff is that the land and house bearing Holding No. 33(old) / 673 (New) is standing over Municipal Plot no. 29272. The description of the suit land was mentioned in Schedule-1 of the plaint which was acquired by Late Bhuwaneshwar Prasad, the father of the pl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top