SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 1016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
Hriday Prakash Gupta, Son of Late Lakshman Prasad Gupta - Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Bihar Bihar - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1824 of 2020 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5641 of 2021
Decided On : 17-12-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadaw (GP-23), Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, AC to GP-23, Mr. Samir Kumar, AC to GP-20
For the University : Mr. Rajesh Prasad Choudhary, Adv.

The court clarified that the Career Advancement Scheme applies to non-teaching staff and directed the university to assess the petitioner's claims for pay-scale and designation changes based on qualifications.

Headnote:(A) Bihar State University Act - Section 35 - Claim for seniority, promotional pay-scale, and change of nomenclature of post - Petitioner appointed as Physical Training Instructor in 1985, seeks benefits from the date of acquiring qualifications - U.G.C. pay-scale revisions and Career Advancement Scheme discussed - Respondents denied claims based on lack of sanctioned posts and qualifications. (Paras 1-26)

(B) Employment Law - The principle that designations must correspond with sanctioned posts is upheld - The applicability of Career Advancement Scheme to non-teaching staff is clarified. (Paras 22-24)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a Physical Training Instructor since 1985, claims entitlement to revised pay-scales and designation as Director of Physical Education based on qualifications and U.G.C. directives.

Findings of Court:
The university must consider the petitioner's case for designation change and pay-scale entitlement within two months, provided he meets the necessary requirements.

Issues: The main issues include the entitlement to U.G.C. pay-scale from the date of qualification and the applicability of the Career Advancement Scheme to non-teaching staff.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the university must assess the petitioner's qualifications and the possibility of creating a sanctioned post for the Director of Physical Education.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

JUDGMENT :

1. Both the writ petitions have been filed by Hriday Prakash Gupta, hereinafter described as petitioner, claiming seniority, promotional pay-scale and change of nomenclature of his post.

2. For sake of convenience, I propose to narrate the facts stated by the petitioner in C.W.J.C. No. 5641 of 2021. The petitioner was appointed as Physical Training Instructor (PTI) on 5th of August, 1985 on the sanctioned post in Mahila College, Dalmianagar in the district of Rohtas. He joined the said college as Physical Training Instructor on 6th of August, 1985. In the year 1985, the college was taken over as a constituent unit of Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. Subsequently, after establishment of Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara, the aforesaid college came under the jurisdiction of Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara. The petitioner's service was regularized w.e.f. 6th of August, 1985. Subsequently, he passed B.P.Ed (Bachelor of Physical Education) from Nagpur University on 28th of June, 1991. He obtained Post Graduate degree on 20th of May, 1994. The University Grant Commission (UGC) revised the pay-scale of PTI to Rs. 700-1600/- w.e.f. 1st of April, 1980 by an order, dated 15th of February, 1982. Subsequently, on 22nd of July, 1988, the U.G.C. revised pay-scale of Physical Education Personnel for maintenance of standards in higher education. In the said order, dated 22nd of July 1988, a formula was delineated for fixation of revised scale of pay of PTI. Further, it was directed that the pay-scale of PTI would be the same as that of the approved Teacher. Vide Annexure - 6, dated 29th of May, 1992, the Joint Secretary, Government of Bihar accepted U.G.C. pay-scale of PTI. Subsequently, on 18th of August, 1993, the Registrar of Veer Kunwar Singh University also accepted U.G.C. pay-scale on and from 20th of March, 1993. The Registrar accepted the pay-scale of Rs. 2200-4000/- w.e.f. 20th of May, 1994.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that as he passed BPEd on 28th of June, 1991 and he is entitled to the said pay-scale on and from the date of BPEd examination. But he was granted the pay-scale of Rs. 2200-4000/- w.e.f. 20th of May, 1994, whereas others were given the said benefit from the date of acquiring qualification. Subsequently, by virtue of Annexure - 10, dated 19th of February, 2009, the petitioner's pay-scale was revised to Rs. 8000-13500/- w.e.f. 1st of January, 1996 and thereafter Rs. 15600-39100/- with pay band of Rs. 6000/- w.e.f. 01.01.2006.

4. Further case of the petitioner is that by virtue of the letter dated 15th of December, 1982, the State Government accepted the proposal of the U.G.C. that the designation of PTI would be Director / Assistant Director of Physical Education and another university in the State of Bihar, namely, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur issued an order, re-designating the Physical Instructors as Director, Physical Education. In case of Veer Kunwar Singh University, the Respondents did not re-designate the petitioner as the Director of Physical Education.

5. Further grievance of the petitioner is that by issuing a letter dated 19th of October, 2006 (Annexure - 12), the Joint Secretary, U.G.C. informed the Registrars with the Ministry of Human Resources Department vide its letter dated 22nd of September, 2006 approved the revised Career Advancement Scheme for the Assistant Librarian, College Librarians, Assistant Director of Physical Education, College Director of Physical Education. The revised scheme as approved by the Ministry of Human Resources Department was clearly stated in letter dated 19th of October, 2006. However, the petitioner was not paid in accordance with the direction of the said letter, dated 19th of October, 2006.

6. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that by order dated 27th of August, 2010 (Annexure - 15), the Bihar Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, revised the pay-scale of the officers and non-teaching staff of the university and c

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top