Back
BIBEK CHAUDHURI
Hriday Prakash Gupta, Son of Late Lakshman Prasad Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Both the writ petitions have been filed by Hriday Prakash Gupta, hereinafter described as petitioner, claiming seniority, promotional pay-scale and change of nomenclature of his post.
2. For sake of convenience, I propose to narrate the facts stated by the petitioner in C.W.J.C. No. 5641 of 2021. The petitioner was appointed as Physical Training Instructor (PTI) on 5th of August, 1985 on the sanctioned post in Mahila College, Dalmianagar in the district of Rohtas. He joined the said college as Physical Training Instructor on 6th of August, 1985. In the year 1985, the college was taken over as a constituent unit of Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. Subsequently, after establishment of Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara, the aforesaid college came under the jurisdiction of Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara. The petitioner's service was regularized w.e.f. 6th of August, 1985. Subsequently, he passed B.P.Ed (Bachelor of Physical Education) from Nagpur University on 28th of June, 1991. He obtained Post Graduate degree on 20th of May, 1994. The University Grant Commission (UGC) revised the pay-scale of PTI to Rs. 700-1600/- w.e.f. 1st of April, 1980 by an order, dated 15th of Febr
The court clarified that the Career Advancement Scheme applies to non-teaching staff and directed the university to assess the petitioner's claims for pay-scale and designation changes based on quali....
Legal entitlement to pay scales depends on prescribed qualifications, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles in administrative decisions.
The Pay Verification Cell lacks authority to unilaterally modify pay scales set by statutory committees, affirming the jurisdiction of University committees in pay fixation.
The court ruled that UGC guidelines for pay revision were effective from September 1990, entitling the petitioner to the revised pay scale from that date.
the relief claimed in the petition, even based on the judgment in the case of Dr B.M. Gupta, is not tenable in law as there is gross delay in approaching the Court even if presuming it to be similar ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
