Back
PURNENDU SINGH
Rubi Kumari Wife of Ajit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Gopal Govind Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner Mr. Kumaresh Singh, learned AC to SC-28 for the State.
2. The petitioner, in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition, has sought, inter alia, the following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:-
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that for redressal of the grievance the petitioner seeks to avail appropriate remedy by filing suit before the competent civil court having jurisdiction in light of the law lai
Anganwadi workers are not considered government employees under Article 311, and their employment is contractual, allowing for civil court remedies.
The court affirmed that selections for Anganwadi Sevika are not subject to civil service protections and emphasized timely actions within procedural guidelines.
Termination of Anganwadi Workers must be done by the Appointing Authority, and the principles of natural justice must be followed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
