SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 221

KHATIM REZA
Bhagirathi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Kumar Tekriwal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Pathak.

ORDER

Re: I.A. No. 03 of 2023

This interlocutory application has been filed for substituting the heirs of appellant no. 1, namely, Bhagirathi Devi who died on 08.08.2018 leaving behind her heirs and legal representatives whose details are mentioned in paragraph no. 2 of the instant interlocutory application.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that earlier the appeal was dismissed for default for non-prosecution of the case and a restoration application bearing M.J.C. No. 1037 of 2015 was filed and during the pendency of the aforesaid M.J.C., appellant no. 1, Bhagirathi Devi died and a petition for substitution of her heirs was filed in the M.J.C. application which was allowed vide order dated 31.01.2023 and present appeal was restored to its original file.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that sons of deceased appellant no. 1 is already on record as appellant nos. 2 to 5 only her three daughters are required to be added as appellant nos. 11 to 13.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants also submits that duly executed vakalatnama is prayed to be filed on behalf of daughters within four weeks because they are residing outside their native place. Learned counsel for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top