SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 739

S. N. PATHAK
Nagendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: D.K. Chakraverty
For the Respondents: Priyadarshi, Shruti Shresth

JUDGMENT :

S.N. PATHAK, J.

1. Heard the parties.

2. At the very outset, petitioner confines his prayer for granting the pensionary benefits from the date of initial appointment i.e. 01.10.1981 and not from the date of regularization i.e. 18.10.2021.

Further prayer has been made to release all the retiral benefits of the petitioner and fix the pension since petitioner has already superannuated from the service on 31.12.2022.

3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the petitioner was initially engaged on daily wages basis in the respondent-Department on 01.10.1981 at Rural Engineering Organization, Works Sub-Division, Chaibasa as ‘Roller Driver’ and since then he has continuously worked and performed his duty. Thereafter, by Office Order dated 19.10.1981, the petitioner was engaged as Jeep Driver on daily wages basis. Again on 26.05.1995, the petitioner was further appointed as Roller Driver and since then he was working as Roller Driver. It is the further case of petitioner that he was appointed on sanctioned and vacant post in a permanent Establishment. Though petitioner had worked continuously for 40 long years but the respondents had not regularized his services. Aggrieved thereto, the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top