Serial No. 112 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
1) Bhushan Lal Age 70 years S/O late Sh. Badri Math R/O village Pernote, Tehsll & District, Ramban.
2) Surat Singh Age 57 years S/O Late Sh. Kishan Singh R/O village Pernote , Tehsil & District, Ramban.
3) Tirath Singh Age 52 years S/O late Sh. Kishan Singh R/O village Pernote, Tehsil & District, Ramban.
4) Durgi Devi Age 78 years W/O late Sh. Kishan Singh R/o village Pernote, Tehsil & District, Ramban.
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Dheeraj Singh Katoch, Advocate.
Vs.
1) Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir through Commissioner-Secretary, Public Works Department(R&B), Civil Secretariat, Jammu/Srinagar.
2) Chief Engineer, Public Works Department(R&B), Jammu.
3) Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department(R&B), Circle Doda. 4) Executive Engineer, Public Works Department(R&B), Division, Ramban.
5) Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (R&B), Sub-
Division, Ramban.
6) Commissioner/Secretary, Revenue Department, J&K Govt. Civil Secretariat, Jammu/ Srinagar.
7) Divisional Commissioner, Jammu.
8) Collector Land Acquisition,(Assistant Commissioner Revenue), Ramban.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG for R-1 to 5.
Ms. Aparna Gupta, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-6 to 8.
WP(C) No. 759/2024
1) Heeru Ram Age 72 years S/O Fattu R/O village Pernote, Tehsil & District, Ramban.
2) Dharam Singh Age 43 years S/O late Sh. Ram Lal R/O village Pernote, Tehsil & District, Ramban.
3) Raj Singh Age 37 years S/O Late Sh. Ram Lal R/O village Pernote, Tehsil & District, Ramban.
4) Krishan Lal Age 34 years S/O late Sh. Ram Lal R/O village Pernote, Tehsil & District, Ramban.
5) Mahinder Singh Age 29 years S/O late Sh. Ram Lal R/O village Pernote, Tehsil & District, Ramban.
6) Beer Singh Age 27 years S/O late Ram Lal R/O village Pernote, Tehsil & District, Ramban …..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Dheeraj Singh Katoch, Advocate.
Vs.
1) Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir through Commissioner-Secretary, Public Works Department (R&B), Civil Secretariat, Jammu/Srinagar.
2) Chief Engineer, Public Works Department (R&B), Jammu.
3) Chief Engineer, Public Works Department (R&B), Chenab Zone, Batote. 4) Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department (R&B), Circle Doda. 5) Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (R&B), Division, Ramban.
6) Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (R&B), Sub-
Division , Ramban.
7) Commissioner/Secretary, Revenue Department, J&K Govt. Civil Secretariat, Jammu/ Srinagar.
8) Divisional Commissioner, Jammu.
9) Deputy Commissioner, Ramban.
10) Collector Land Acquisition, (Assistant Commissioner, Revenue), Ramban.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG for R-1 to 6.
Ms. Aparna Gupta, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-7 to 10.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER :
01. Petitioners through the medium of these petitions filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India seek the following reliefs:-
WP(C) No. 1254/2022
a. Writ of mandamus, commanding the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings and valuate and assess the compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 of respective land owned and possessed by the petitioners, which has been acquired for the purposes of construction of road from Pernote-Thalwah Link Road at Village Pernote, Tehsil and District, Ramban and pass the final award without further delay;
b. A further writ of mandamus, commanding the respondents to pay the compensation for acquisition of land of the petitioners within specific timeframe;
c. Such other additional or alternate relief, which this Court may in the facts and circumstances of the case, deem fit and proper, be also awarded in favour of the petitioners.”
WP(C) No. 1254/2022
a. Writ of mandamus, commanding the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings and valuate and assess the compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 of respective land owned and possessed by the petitioners, which has been acquired for the purposes of construction of road from Pernote-Thalwah Link Road at Village Pernote, Tehsil and District, Ramban and pass the final award without further delay;
b. A further writ of mandamus, commanding the respondent Nos. 1 to 6 to deposit the compensation amount with the respondent No. 10 promptly so as to enable respondent Nos. 8 to 10 to publish the declaration;
c. Such other additional or alternate relief, which this Court may in the facts and circumstances of the case, deem fit and proper, be also awarded in favour of the petitioners.”
02. Learned counsel for the petitioners while making submissions, has drawn the attention of this Court towards the Communication No. CEJ/LA/216-18 dated 18.10.2022 addressed by the Chief Engineer, PW(R&B) Department, Jammu to the Deputy Commissioner, Ramban, with regard to an indent for acquisition of land under the Right to Fair Compensation Transparency and Land Acquisition, (Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act), 2013 with regard to land falling under the proposed construction of road from Pernote to Thalwa NABARD RIDF-XXIII, to be executed by the PWD(R&B) Division, Ramban.
03. Learned counsel for the Collector submits that the Collector Land Acquisition (Assistant Commissioner, Revenue), Ramban (in short, “Collector”) has received the indent and further proceedings have been initiated thereon.
04. In view of the Communication of the indenting department through respondent No. 2-Chief Engineer Public Works (R&B), Jammu vide his No. CEJ/LA/216- 18 dated 18.10.2022 requesting the District Collector to initiate the acquisition proceedings for the land, falling under Pernote-Thalwa Road, to be executed under NABARD by the Public Works Department and the submission by the counsel for the Collector (ACR), Ramban that acquisition proceedings have already been initiated, nothing survives to be adjudicated in both these petitions.
05. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the Collector, these petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Collectorate to proceed in the matter in accordance with law, expeditiously, having regard to the timeline provided under the statute.
06. Both the writ petitions are, accordingly, disposed of, alongwith connected applications. Copies of this order be placed across the files of both the cases.:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
The court ruled that once acquisition proceedings are initiated, petitions seeking mandamus for compensation assessment are rendered moot.
Timely processing of compensation applications under land acquisition laws is essential for fulfilling the rights of property owners.
Proper compensation assessment procedures under Section 64 of the 2013 Act must be followed, allowing the authority to consider referral and potential delays for justifiable reasons.
The Court mandates that the respondents consider the petitioners' compensation representation under relevant land acquisition laws.
A direction was issued to consider the petitioners' representation for compensation for land acquisition under applicable law.
The competent authority must examine land acquisition compensation claims and ensure timely decisions are made.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.