SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1351

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ANIL KUMAR SINHA, J.
CWJC No.2225 of 2025
(1.9.2025)
Md Arshad Ekbal ... Petitioners
vs.
Maulana Azad Natitonal Urdu University & Ors. ... Respondents

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/s Amaresh Kumar Singh, Dineshwar Prasad Singh.
For the Respondents: Mrs. Shama Sinha.

Headnote:

University Law – Retirement – Recovery – Excess payment on revision of pay on conversion from "Other Academic Staff" to "Non-Teaching" staff – Appointment letter of petitioner categorically specified that petitioner shall be governed by rules and regulations of Maulana Azad National Urdu University for "Non-Teaching" employees including service contract and orders issued by U.G.C. / University / Govt. of India from time to time – Petitioner applied for appointment in response to advertisement for appointment as Regional Director (Non-Teaching), accepted offer of appointment on Non-Teaching post without protest and accepted terms and conditions of appointment meant for Non-Teaching employees – Now he cannot be allowed at this stage nearing retirement to challenge conditions of service under which he has served for almost about two decades – Petitioner has rightly been allowed to superannuate after attaining age of sixty years – Petitioner given liberty to file representation before respondents authority on the point of recovery. (Paras 18 to 21)

Anil Kumar Sinha, J. – The petitioner has preferred the present writ application for quashing the letter no. 1098 dated 05.11.2024 issued by the respondent no. 4 whereby the petitioner has been informed that the petitioner would superannuate on 28.02.2025 on attaining the age of superannuation of sixty years. Further it has been informed that recovery of excess payment on revision of pay on conversion from “Other Academic Staff” to “Non Teaching” staff is also pending and the petitioner was requested to submit APARs of previous five years for taking necessary action to award financial upgradation under MACP before retirement.

2. The petitioner basically has challenged his age of superannuation in the present writ application on the ground that the post on which the petitioner was working i.e. Regional Director is a teaching post but the respondents authority has treated the post as Non Teaching and made the petitioner to retire at the age of sixty years which is the retirement age of Non Teaching employees whereas retirement age of teaching employees is 65 years.

3. The brief facts giving rise to the present writ application is that Maulana Azad National Urdu University (hereinafter referred to as “MANUU”) is a Central University established under the Act of Parliament in 1998. The University is fully funded by the Government of India through University Grants Commission (for short U.G.C.). It offers education through both regular and distance modes and operates Regional Centres across the country. The Executive Council is the Apex governing body of the University. The U.G.C. considering the nature of work / functions of the Regional Director (RD) and Assistant Regional Director (ARD) has approved the posts of Regional Director and Assistant Regional Director. The University issued employment notification no. 17 / 2006 dated 30.07.2006 for appointment of Regional Director in the pay scale of Rs. 12,000 - 18,3000/- in the category of Academic Administrator (Non - Teaching) as would be evident from Annexure – R/2 of the counter affidavit filed by MANUU as well as Annexure: P / 2 of the writ application.

4. The petitioner applied for the post of Regional Director under the category of Academic Administrator having qualification of Ph.D, NET, JRF in Urdu from JNU, M.A. & M. Phil from JNU with teaching experience.

5. The petitioner was appointed on the post of Regional Director (Academic Administrator), Regional Centre , Mumbai in the pay scale of Rs. 12,000- 18,300/- with two increments protecting his present basic pay plus usual allowance as admissible. The appointment letter further stipulates that he would be governed by rules and regulations of MANUU for Non Teaching employees. The petitioner joined his service at Regional Centre, Mumbai. The petitioner accepted the offer of appointment and submitted a letter dated 08.12.2006 to the Registrar of MANUU that he would report to Regional Centre, Mumbai Office as directed with required documents on 13.12.2006 . The copy of letter is annexure – R/3 to the counter affidavit. The petitioner retired from the post of Regional Director, Regional Centre, Darbhanga as per the impugned letter on 28.02.2025.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the University earlier issued notification no. 14 / 2005 dated 06.08.2005 considering the post of Regional Director as teaching post but notification no. 17 / 2006 dated 30.07.2006 under which the petitioner was appointed, the respondents have advertised the said post as Non -Teaching. However the Executive Council of the University held meeting on 23.11.2006 and it is clear from agenda no. 50 of the meeting that it was meant to fill up the teaching posts. Minutes of the meeting dated 23.11.2006 at item no. 50 shows that agenda was for filling up of teaching positions including the post of Regional Director. The Executive Council approved the recommendation of the Selection Committee including the selection post of Regional Director and the n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top