SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1390

PURNENDU SINGH
Nikesh Jha – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s Rajesh Sinha, Aarsh Kumar, Chandan Kumar Singh, Ravi Kant Tiwari.
For the State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.P.P.

Purnendu Singh, J.—Heard Mr. Rajesh Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred application under Section 528 BNSS for quashing of the order dated 19.12.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Jhanjharpur in Phulparas P.S. Case No. 200 of 2021 by which, the application filed by the petitioner under Section 227 Cr.P.C. has been rejected.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the petitioner along with five other accused persons, had allegedly assaulted the informant causing injury on the vital part of the body including head injury. Specific allegation against the petitioner apart from having assaulted the informant along with other accused persons, is also that he had snatched a sum of rupees twenty thousand from the pocket of the informant. The FIR was lodged under Sections 341, 323, 308, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, however, the charge-sheet was submitted on 31.08.2021 under Sections 341, 323, 308 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that from bare perusal of the FIR, it becomes apparent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top