SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 1418

PURNENDU SINGH
Zamir Ahmad Khan @ Jamir Ahamad Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s Shailendra Kumar Singh, Karu Kumar.
For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Raj Kishor Singh, APP.

Purnendu Singh, J.—Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

2. The petitioners have preferred application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. / 528 BNSS for quashing of the order dated 14.10.2025 passed in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.125/2021 by the learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Kaimur at Bhabhua, whereby discharge petition dated 15.09.2025 filed on behalf of the petitioners under Section 250 of BNSS was dismissed.

3. The prosecution story, in short is that marriage of the informant was solemnized with one Azami Mohammad Meraj Khan/the son of petitioner no.1 (father-in-law of O.P. No.2) on 31.05.2025 and at the time of marriage, her father gave Rs.3,50,000/- for purchasing the home appliances and Rs.3,00,000/- for purchasing the ornaments. Two months after the marriage, her husband and in-laws started demanding a Baleno car in the form of dowry, which was not fulfilled by her father and for non-fulfillment of the demand, they subjected her to cruelty both mental and physical. In the meantime, the informant became pregnant but it resulted into miscarriage. Informant has fu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top