IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ANIL KUMAR SINHA, J.
M/s Responce Renewable Energy Limited - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Industry, Government of Bihar, Patna. – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16164 of 2022, 16335 of 2022
Decided On : 09-02-2026
Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy, 2011 – Claim for interest subsidy from the date of commercial production in terms of Industrial Incentive (Amendment) Policy, 2014 [Clause 8] – Requirement of approval of Board is a threshold eligibility condition relating to establishment of industrial unit – Petitioners' units have already obtained approval from Board from date of entry into power purchase agreement – Policy framework does not require fresh or separate approval of Board merely because additional incentive was introduced subsequently by way of amendment – Dates of commercial production of units are also after coming into force of 2014 Amendment Policy – Units have availed term loan from bank – Once an industrial unit stands validly approved under the Policy and satisfied post amendment conditions, unit becomes eligible for consideration of interest subsidy – To construe Board's approval requirement otherwise than condition as mentioned in letter granting approval, shall be erroneous – Petitioners fulfilled all criteria as mentioned in Resolution, dated 11.06.2015 for applying 2014 Amendment Policy for grant of interest subsidy – Impugned orders set aside and respondents directed to calculate amount of subsidy on interest as per claim raised by petitioners in their respective applications within a period of one month and pay the amount within a maximum period of four months – Writ Applications allowed. (Paras 47, 48, 49, 53 to 56)
Cases Referred:
M. Rajendran vs. M/s KPK Oils and Proteins India Pvt. Ltd., 2025 SCC ONLINE 2036 – Relied.
Suprabhat Steels vs. State of Bihar, (1995) 2 PLJR 536; State of Bihar vs. Suprabhat Steels Ltd., (1999) 1 SCC 31; M/s Sunny Stars Hotels Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Bihar, 2020 (2) BLJ 55 : 2020 (2) PLJR 327 – Referred.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners are solar power companies. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 20 , 22) |
| 2. 2011 policy and 2014 amendment policy detail subsidy provisions. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. counsel argues for entitlement to interest subsidy. (Para 29 , 30 , 34 , 36) |
| 4. court reviews criteria for subsidy eligibility. (Para 41 , 42 , 45 , 46) |
| 5. petitioners fulfilled criteria for subsidy eligibility. (Para 53 , 54) |
| 6. court orders payment of interest subsidy. (Para 55 , 56 , 57) |
JUDGMENT :
The petitioners are the companies engaged in the generation of solar power and have filed the present writ applications for quashing of the orders, dated 12.09.2022 and 26.09.2022, issued vide Memo Nos. SIPB/906 and SIPB/114, respectively, by the respondent-Director of Industries, Bihar and for a direction to the respondents to reimburse the interest subsidy of 2 per cent on the term loan of rupees 49.92 crores and 16.50 crores, respectively. The petitioners have further prayed for a declaration that the companies are entitled for the interest subsidy from the date of commercial production, i.e. 30.03.2017 and 28.02.2017 respectively till seven years, as provided under the Industrial Incentive (Amendment) Policy, 2014.
2. I. A. No. 1 of 2025 has been filed in both the writ applications for amendment in the prayer for a direction to the respondent-State to disburse the amount of Rs. 5,57,84,700/- and Rs. 1,90,66,231/- respectively towards the interest subsidy for a period of 7 years from 01.04.2017 to 31.03.2024 and 01.03.2017 to 01.03.2024 respectively, and also to pay interest at the rate of 2 per cent upon the entire calculated amount.
3. Considering the nature of prayer made in the I. A. Nos. 01 of 2025, in both the writ applications, the same are allowed and will take the forming part of the main writ applications.
BRIEF FACTS OF CWJC No. 16164 OF 2022
4. The petitioner is a Public Limited Company, duly incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, on 13.12.2011, bearing Corporate Identity Number U31908WB2007PLC118886, and having its registered office at 76, Pandit Purushottam Roy Street, Kolkata.
5. With a view to promote industrial development within the State of Bihar, the Government of Bihar formulated and notified the Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy , 2011 (herein after referred to as ‘2011 Policy’), promising various fiscal and non- fiscal incentives to attract industrial investment.
6. The 2011 Policy was approved by the State Cabinet and notified in the Official Gazette vide Resolution No. 691, dated 09.06.2011, issued by the Department of Industries and published on 10.06.2011. A copy of the 2011 Policy has been annexed as Annexure 2 to the writ application.
7. Upon mid-term review of the 2011 Policy, the State Government decided to introduce certain amendments in the 2011 Policy. Accordingly, the Department of Industries issued the Industrial Incentive (Amendment) Policy, 2014 (herein after referred to as the ‘2014 Amendment Policy’), vide Letter No. 11, dated 05.01.2015, which was made effective from the date of its notification (Annexure 4).
8. The 2014 Amendment Policy was framed by introducing specific amendments to the 2011 Policy, and Clause 8 thereof inserted sub-paragraph (vi) in Paragraph 4 of the 2011 Policy, thereby providing for grant of interest subsidy at the rate of 2 per cent on the interest charged on term loans availed from the banks or financial institutions, payable for a maximum period of seven years from the date of commencement of commercial production.
9. In furtherance of the promises made under the 2014 Amendment Policy, the Department of Industries, Government of Bihar, issued a notification bearing Memo No. 982, dated 11.06.2015, laying down the procedure for grant of interest subsidy and specifying the date from which the amendment would take effect (Annexure–5).
10. The petitioner company applied for approval of the proposal for establishment of 25 MW power generation solar unit, initially proposed to be set up
The court affirmed that companies meeting criteria under the Bihar Industrial Incentive policies are entitled to interest subsidies from the commencement of commercial production, irrespective of pri....
Existing units commencing production before new industrial policy but not availing prior incentives eligible under amended transitional Clause 8(b); prior clearances create vested rights invoking pro....
The main legal point established is that the entitlement to subsidies under the WBSSIS-2008 should be determined based on the specific provisions of the Scheme, and the refusal of subsidies based on ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity for determining the real questions in controversy between the parties and the consideration of prejudice or injustice to the other pa....
The principle of estoppel prevents authorities from withdrawing subsidies once granted, especially when businesses have acted on the original policy.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.