Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Sunil Dutta Mishra, J
Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. final observations on complaint validity. (Para 8) |
| 2. final judgment and dismissal. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT :
SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for quashing the order dated 14.11.2014 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur (hereinafter referred to as ‘Magistrate’) in connection with Complaint Case No. C1-2065 of 2013 wherein the learned Trial Court took cognizance of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act , 1881 (hereinafter referred to as ‘N.I. Act’) against the petitioner and accordingly, directed to issue process.
3. The fact of the case, in brief, is that the complaint was instituted by Opposite Party No.2 alleging that on 11.02.2013 the petitioner approached him for a loan of Rs.1,00,000/-, out of which a sum of Rs.95,000/- was allegedly advanced in the presence of witnesses, and in discharge of the said liability, a cheque dated 11.03.2013 for Rs.95,000/- was issued by the petitioner. It is further alleged that upon presentation, the cheque was dishonoured due to i
The court reaffirmed that the presumption of liability under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must be established through evidence at trial, not pre-trial.
Dishonour of cheque – Consequences of scuttling criminal process at a pre-trial stage can be grave and irreparable.
(1) Dishonour of cheques – Legal presumption of cheque having been issued in discharge of liability must also receive due weightage.(2) To non-suit complainant, at the stage of summoning order, when ....
The issuance of a cheque implies liability under the NI Act, and courts should not quash complaints based on disputed facts without trial.
Dishonour of cheque – In exceptional circumstances, Court may take notice of attending circumstances to conclude that continuance of proceedings would amount to abuse of process of Court, or where qu....
The court reiterated that issues around cheque liability under Section 138 NI Act must be decided at trial, underscoring the necessity for allegations in complaints to be accepted as true at the quas....
The court held that a cheque issued as security does not invalidate a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and factual disputes must be settled at trial.
A cheque issued as security does not negate potential liability under S.138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act if essential legal conditions are met.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
