ORDER :

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

2. The present Civil Revision application has been preferred under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’) challenging the legality and propriety of the order dated 14.08.2019 passed by the learned District Judge, Rohtas, Sasaram (hereinafter referred to as ‘Appellate Court’) in Title Appeal No. 82 of 2013 whereby and whereunder, the learned Appellate Court allowed the application filed by the State under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) and condoned an extraordinary delay of about 22 years in filing the appeal, thereby admitting the same for hearing on merits. The petitioner, being aggrieved, has approached this Court seeking interference in revisional jurisdiction.

3. The facts of the case in brief is that the Title Suit No. 96 of 1982/147 of 1990 was instituted by the father of the present petitioner seeking declaration of title and confirmation of possession along with permanent injunction in respect of the suit property. The said suit was contested and ultimately decreed in favour of the plaintif