CHAKRABARTI, BACHAWAT
GOUR MOHAN MULLICK – Appellant
Versus
COMMR OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THE question raised by this reference has often arisen under the Income-tax Act and has been answered by different High Courts, other than this Court, in different ways. So far as this Court is concerned, it does not appear that the question came up on any previous occasion, either under the Income-tax Act or under the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act under which it has now arisen.
( 2 ) THE present reference is by the Agricultural Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and arises out of the following simple facts. In respect of his agricultural income for the accounting year, 1943-44, an assessment order was made on the assessee, Gour Mohan Mullick, on 5-1-1949. The notice of demand was received by him on the 1st of February next, but he did not prefer an appeal to the Assistant Commissioner till 30-5-1949. Since under Section 34 (2) the period of limitation for riling an appeal is 'ordinarily' thirty days from the receipt of the notice of demand, the Assistant Commissioner issued a notice to the assessee to show cause why the petition of appeal should not be rejected as time-barred. Cause was shown but as the Assistant Commissioner did not consider it satisfacto
K.K. Porbunderwalla v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City
Shivnath Prasad v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central and United Provinces
Md. Naim Md. Alam v. Commissioner of Income Tax, U.P.
REFERRED TO : Commissioner of Income-tax v. Shahzadi Begum
Municipal Board, Agra v. Commissioner of Income-tax, U.P.
Special Manager, Court of Wards v. Commissioner of Income Tax, U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.