DIPAK KUMAR SEN
BROOKE BOND INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Respondent
( 1 ) BROOKE Bond India Ltd. , the petitioner No. 1, is an existing company within the meaning of the Companies Act, 1956. Satya Paul Saigal, the petitioner No. 2, is a shareholder of the petitioner No. 1. The petitioner No. 1 carries on business in tea. Purchased in India, such tea is sold by the petitioner No. 1 in India and is also exported abroad.
( 2 ) PRODUCTION of tea in India involves the following : tea leaves plucked from plants in the tea gardens are subjected to successive processes known as withering, rolling fermentation, firing and sorting at the factories or processing centres.
( 3 ) MANUFACTURED as aforesaid, tea is packed in chests in bulk by the manufacturers and are cleared upon payment of Central Excise Duty for being sold in different auction centres.
( 4 ) THE petitioner's case is that the manufacture of tea is completed in the factory and processing centres as aforesaid whereby a manufactured product known as tea, fit for human consumption, is brought into existence.
( 5 ) THE petitioner No. 1 does not own any tea garden and purchases tea of different varieties from the auction centres all over India upon payment of appropriate Centr
Inland Revenue Commissioner v. Duke of Westminister
C.A.Abraham v. I.T.O., Kottayam
Patel India (Private) Ltd. v. Union of India
Union of India v. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd.
State of Maharashtra v. Central Provinces Manganese Ore Co. Ltd.
P.C.Cheriyan v. Mst. Barfi Devi
Deputy Commr., Sales Tax (Law) Board of Revenue and (Taxes) v. Pio Food Packers
Chowgule and Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Musarafalli Kutubuddin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.