S.B.SINHA, BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA
AMIT KUMAR AGARWALLA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 2 ) THE writ application being W. P. 16143 (W) of 1997 was filed by Ajit Kumar Agarwala and Amit Kumar Agarwala praying, inter alia, for the following reliefs :" (A) A writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus be issued commanding the respondents for the production of the body of your petitioners in the Court and your petitioner be set at liberty; (B) Injunction restraining the respondents from interferring with the personal liberty of the petitioners or from further arresting the petitioners without leave of the Court. "
( 3 ) IN the said writ application it appears that certain interim orders had been passed by this Court. On 18-8-97, two other writ applications being W. P. No. 16674 (W) of 1997 and W. P. No. 16659 were filed by Ajit Kumar Agarwalla and Amit Kumar Agarwalla respectively and on that date rule nisi had been issued and directions for affidavit had also been given. Another writ application being W. P. No. 17178 (W) of 1997 has been filed by one Rajendra Kanodia on 22-8-97 wherein also rule nisi had been issued and direction for affi
REFERRED TO : Anand Damani v. Union of India
Income-tax v. Sun Engineering Co. Ltd.
REFERRED TO : Krishna Kumar v. Union of India
Md. Zakir v. Delhi Administration
Mangal Bhai Motiram Patel v. State of Maharashtra
relied upon : Ramchandra A. Kamat v. Union of India
observed : Shalini Soni v. Union of India
REFERRED TO : Icchu Devi Choraria v. Union of India
Paban Kumar Dubey v. Regional Manager
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.