SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Cal) 79

MAHEMMAD HABEEB SHAMS ANSARI, RUMA PAL
SMRITI JAISWAL – Appellant
Versus
ROMI JAISWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.GHOSH, Deb Dutta Sen, HIRAK MITRA, Maharaja Sen, R.M.BACHVAT

M. H. S. ANSARI, J.

( 1 ) THE instant appeal is directed against the error of the learned trial Judge dated 30th November, 1998 on an application of the appellants/defendants Nos. 2 and 3 inter alia, praying for revocation of leave granted under Clause 12 of Letters Patent and for dismissal of the suit. By the said order, the learned single Judge dismissed the application of the appellants/defendants Nos. 2 and 3.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience, reference to the notice in this judgment shall be made as they have been arrayed in the suit being C. S. No. 393 of 1997. The plaintiff is respondent No. 1 in the instant appeal and the defendant No. 1 is respondent No. 2 herein. Defendants Nos. 2 and 3 are the appellants in the instant appeal.

( 3 ) THE case of the plaintiff as set out in the plaint, briefly stated, is that in or about 1979 Krishna Lal Jaiswal (since deceased) began carrying on business in partnership with his two sons, being plaintiff and one Aswini Kumar Jaiswal under the name and style of M/s. Sujata Picture Palace at 3a, Madan Street, Calcutta. The said Krishna Lal Jaiswal died on September, 1982 and the partnership was reconstituted with plaintiff, his mother be

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top