Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI, R. B. MISRA, O. CHHINNAPPA REDDY, P. N. BHAGWATI
S. P. Mittal: Raghubir: Aurobindo Society: Aurobindo Society – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. (Minority view):- I have the good fortune of having before me the scholarly judgment of my brother Misra J., I agree with my brother Misra J., that the writ petitions must fail. With much that he has said, also, I agree. But with a little, to my own lasting regret, I do not agree. It is, therefore, proper for me to explain the points of my disagreement.
2. Quite a considerable part of the hearing of the petitions was devoted to a debate on the question, what is Religion? Religion : Everyone has a religion, or at least, a view or a window on religion, be he a bigot or simple believer, philosopher or pedestrian, atheist or agnostic Religion, like democracy and equality is an elusive expression, which everyone understands according to his preconceptions. What is religion to some is pure dogma to others and what is religion to others is pure superstition to some others. Karl Marx in his contribution to the Critique of Hegels Philosophy of Law described religion as the Opium of the People. He said further "Basically religion is a very convenient sanctuary for bourgeois thought to flee to in times of stress". Bertrand Russell, in his essay Why I am not a Christ
Durgah Committee, Ajmer v. Syed Hussain Ali
Sastri Yagnapurushadji v.Muldas Bhudardas Vaishta
relied on : Hiralal Mallick v. State of Bihar
relied on : Digyadarsan Rajerdra Ramdassji Varu v. State of A.P.
Durgah Committee, Ajmer Y. Syed Hussain AK
Tilkayat Shri Govindlalji Maharaj v. State of Rajasthan
Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar Sri Shirur Mutt
Rev.Sidhajbhai Sabhai v. State of Bombay
State of Kerala v. Very Rev. Mother Provincial
Ratitat Panachaml Garnihi v. State of Bombay
Durgah Committee, Ajmer v. Syed Hussain Ali
Tilkayat Shri Govindlalji Maharaj v. State of Rajasthan
Raja Birakishore v. State of Orissa
Sastri Yagnapurushadji v.Muldas Bhudardas Vaishya
relied on : Budhan Choudhry v. State of Bihar
Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Justice S.R. Tendulkar
Raja Birakishore State of Orissa
Chiranjit Lal Choudhry v. Union of India
distinguished : Ram Prasad Narayan Sahi v. State of Bihar
Union of India v. U.S. Dhillon
Board of Trustees, Ayurvedic and Unani Tibia College v. State of Delhi
Katra Educational Society v. State of U.P
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.