SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Cal) 224

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, RAJENDRA NATH SINHA
SRIRAM RAYONS – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK NAIN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MADHUSUDAN ROY, SAYANDEV SENGUPTA, SUDIPA ROY

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS first appeal is at the instance of the defendant No. 1 in a suit for specific performance of contract and mandatory injunction and is directed against the preliminary decree dated 27th April, 2001 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 6th Court, Alipore, District-South 24-Parganas in Title Suit No. 85 of 1995 thereby granting a decree of specific performance of contract for appointment of Government valuer by both sides for fixation of rate of rent and payment of the same. The parties were directed to appoint a Government valuer each, within two months from that date and if any one of the parties failed or neglected to appoint such Government valuer, the report of the other side would be accepted by the Court by virtue of the said decree. The appellants were directed to deposit Rs. 6,000/- per month provisionally before the Court from May, 2001.

( 2 ) THERE is no dispute that the appellant was a tenant under the plaintiff in respect of a Godown, the tenancy being governed by the provisions contained in West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. The plaintiff-landlord had filed this suit for specific performance of agreement between t




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top