SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Cal) 477

ANIRUDDHA BOSE
Sukumar Mukherjee – Appellant
Versus
Medical Council of India – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
Advocates for the petitioner in W.P. No. 9758 (W) of 2011, and Respondent No. 2 in W.P. No. 3993(W) of 2013:Mr. Saktinath Mukherjee Mr. Sundarananda Pal Ms. Pinky Anand (…Senior Advocates) Mr. Gautam Mitra Mr. Debojyoti Dutta, Mr. R. Medora Ms. Nirvika Dutta Respondent No.4 in W.P. No. 9758(W) of 2011 & Petitioner in W.P. No. 3993(W) of 2013: Dr. Kunal Saha (In person)
Advocates for the Medical Council of India (In both the writ Petitions):Mr. Sugata Bhattacharya Mr. Sumit Kumar Ray Ms. Debopama Mukhopadhyay Advocates for the West Bengal Medical Council (In both the Writ petition): Mr. Jaydip Kar Mr. Saibalendu Bhowmick Ms. Manisha Bhowmick
Advocates for the State: Mr. Jaharlal De Ms. Anjusree Mukherjee

JUDGMENT

ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.:-

1. The petitioner in W.P. No. 9758 (W) of 2011 is Dr. Sukumar Mukherjee, a medical practitioner. He has challenged the validity of an order passed by the Medical Council of India (MCI) acting in the capacity of appellate authority over the West Bengal Medical Council (the State Council) in relation to a proceeding involving allegations of medical negligence. By this order issued on 23 May 2011, the MCI has directed removal of the writ petitioner’s name for a period of three months from the register of the State Council. The State Council had cleared the writ petitioner of the charge of negligence by its decision dated 18 June, 2002. The order of 23 May, 2011 was issued by the MCI in an appeal filed by Dr. Kunal Saha (the respondent no. 4 in W.P. No. 9758 (W) of 2011) under the provisions of Clause 8.8 of the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002 (the 2002 Regulations), framed under the provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (the 1956 Act). Dr. Saha is also a medical practitioner involved, inter alia, in research work, based in the United States of America. He was the complainant before the State





































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top