SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Cal) 75

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
DIPANKAR DATTA, TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY, SHEKHAR B. SARAF, JJ.
MANAGING COMMITTEE, KADAMTALA HIGH MADRASAH - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 11254 of 2010, 11255 of 2010, 12879 of 2010, 12882 of 2010, 7884 of 2010, 23303 of 2010, 31299 of 2014, 8820 of 2014
Decided on : 13-03-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Biswaroop Bhattacharya, Adv., Anindya Bose, Adv., Ashim Kumar Halder, Adv., B. Nandy, Adv., R.K. Ghosh, Adv., Kishore Dutta, Adv., Joytosh Majumdar, Adv., Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Adv., Somnath Naskar, Adv., Pinaki Dhole, Adv., Nibaran Kumar Das, Adv., Ziaul Haque, Adv., Srimanta Dutta, Adv., Manik Kumar Dan, Adv.

The new rules were held to be applicable to the selection process, and the grant of prior permission did not confer any vested right in the management to complete the selection process by following the earlier rules upon legislative change in the selection rules before publication of advertisement for the vacant post under the old rules.

Headnote:

RECRUITMENT - NON-TEACHING STAFF - West Bengal Schools (Control of Expenditure) Act, 2005, West Bengal Schools (Recruitment of Non-teaching Staff) Rules, 2005, West Bengal School Service Commission Act, 1997, West Bengal School Service Commission (Amendment) Act, 2008, West Bengal School Service Commission (Selection of Persons for Appointment to the Post of Non-teaching Staff) Rules, 2009, Management of Recognised Non-Government Institutions (Aided and Non-Aided) Rules, 1969 - The court discussed the commencement of the selection process towards appointment of non-teaching staff in recognized educational institutions under various Acts and Rules.

Fact of the Case:

A legal tussle has spiralled up to this Court primarily seeking a quietus to the issue as regards commencement of a selection process towards appointment of non-teaching staff in recognized educational institutions. The writ petitions involved similar issues of facts and law regarding the commencement of the selection process towards appointment of non-teaching staff in recognized educational institutions.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed all the writ petitions as the new rules were held to be applicable to the selection process, and the grant of prior permission did not confer any vested right in the management to complete the selection process by following the earlier rules upon legislative change in the selection rules before publication of advertisement for the vacant post under the old rules.

Issues: The issues involved the acceptance of the law operating in the field of direct recruitment, the acceptance of the law laid down by the earlier Division Bench, the creation of vested rights in the management to complete the selection process, and the commencement of the selection process.

Ratio Decidendi: The new rules were held to be applicable to the selection process, and the grant of prior permission did not confer any vested right in the management to complete the selection process by following the earlier rules upon legislative change in the selection rules before publication of advertisement for the vacant post under the old rules. The selection process would commence only after the advertisement asking candidates to apply for a particular post.

Final Decision: All the writ petitions were dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY, J.

1. A legal tussle has spiralled up to this Court primarily seeking a quietus to the issue as regards commencement of a selection process towards appointment of non-teaching staff in recognized educational institutions.

2. By an administrative order the Hon'ble the Chief Justice constituted this Bench to answer the issues formulated in a judgment delivered on 27th January, 2011 in two writ petitions, being WP 11255 (W) of 2010 and WP 11254 (W) of 2010, and a judgment delivered on 3rd November, 2014 in a writ petition being WP 23303 (W) of 2010. Writ petitions being WP 12879 (W) of 2010, WP 12882 (W) of 2010, WP 7884 (W) of 2010, WP 31299 (W) of 2014 and WP 8820 (W) of 2014 involving similar issues of facts and law have also been placed before this Court for analogous hearing.

3. For a purposeful deliberation and to answer the issues as formulated, we need to set out the facts involved in the lis and the statutory provisions applicable.

4. Under the West Bengal Schools (Control of Expenditure) Act, 2005 (in short, 2005 Act), the West Bengal Schools (Recruitment of Non-teaching Staff) Rules, 2005 (in short, 2005 Rules) were framed and the same came into effect from 26th December, 2005. Subsequent thereto, the West Bengal School Service Commission Act, 1997 was amended by the West Bengal School Service Commission (Amendment) Act, 2008 (in short, the Amendment Act of 2008) and thereafter the West Bengal School Service Commission (Selection of Persons for Appointment to the Post of Non-teaching Staff) Rules, 2009 (in short, 2009 Rules) were framed and the same came into effect from 9th July, 2009. By the 2009 Rules, the earlier 2005 Rules stood superseded. Thereafter, in terms of memo no.28-SE(S) dated 8th January, 2010, the Management of Recognised Non-Government Institutions (Aided and Non-Aided) Rules, 1969 (in short, 1969 Rules) were amended to make provision for recruitment of non-teaching staff in respect of all recognised non-government aided educational institutions in the State solely on the recommendation of the West Bengal School Service Commission. With the issuance of the 2009 Rules, and with the amendment of the Management Rules, the school authorities no longer enjoyed the statutory power to conduct interview for recruitment of non-teaching staff.

5. The writ petition being WP 12879 (W) of 2010 was preferred by one Gopal Patra praying for a direction upon the respondents to issue prior permission for filling up a vacancy in a Group-'D' post in Sahapur Girls High School. The post fell vacant due to the retirement of one Anadi Nath Paul on 30th June, 2002 and though prior permission was sought for from the District Inspector of Schools (SE) (in short, DI) by the school authorities upon adopting a resolution on 13th August, 2002, the DI did not respond. The said writ petition was affirmed on 25th March, 2010.

6. The writ petition being WP 12882 (W) of 2010 was also affirmed on 25th March, 2010. One Abdul Kalam Mallik, the President of the managing committee of Joygram J. N. High School (HS) preferred the writ petition stating inter alia that though prior permission was sought for to fill up the vacancies in two posts of Group-'D' staff, which occurred on 1st February, 2003 and 1st February, 2004 respectively, the DI did not respond.

7. One Sri Subrata Sengupta preferred a writ petition being WP 7884 (W) of 2010 seeking direction upon the DI to grant prior permission to fill up a Group-'D' post at Parui Radhakrishna Vidyapith (HS) and to allow him to participate in the selection process pertaining to the said post upon condonation of age since he was working in the said post on temporary basis on and from 2nd April, 2000. Subsequent thereto, the school authorities approached the DI on 2nd June, 2005 to fill up another Group-'D' post which fell vacant due to the demise of one Sri Ranjit Mandal but in vain. The said writ petition was affirmed on 16th April, 2010.

8. To fill up a vacancy in a Grou




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top