SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI
Dayabati Das – Appellant
Versus
Meera Das – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This second appeal is at the instance of the defendant nos. 1, 2 and 3/appellants against the judgment and decree dated September 11, 2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court at Hooghly in Title Appeal No. 113 of 2006 affirming the judgment dated March 30, 2006 and decree dated April 7, 2006 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Additional Court at Hooghly in Title Suit No. 150 of 2003. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 were the plaintiffs before the trial Court whereas the respondent nos. 3 to 7 were defendants in the suit. Defendant nos. 3 to 7 adopted the submission of the appellants and supported the stand taken by them. Only plaintiffs/respondents contested the appeal.
2. According to the plaint case, the predecessor of both the plaintiffs and the defendants, namely, Prasanna Kumar Das, during his lifetime engaged his son Monimohan Das for purchase of some properties in the name of Prasanna Kumar Das with his money and to get the sale deed registered in his name. But Moni Mohan Das, with some ulterior motive, got the document in his n
Abdul Rahim & Ors. Vs. Sk. Abdul Zabar & Ors.
Bhim Singh (dead) by L. Rs and Anr. Vs. Kan Singh
K.B. Saha and Sons Private Limited Vs. Development Consultant Limited
Pratima Paul & Ors. Vs. Rupa Paul & Ors.
Shyam Narayan Prasad Vs. Krishna Prasad and Ors.
SMS Tea Estates Private Limited Vs. Chandmari Tea Company Private Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.