PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, KRISHNA RAO
Sukanta Mallick – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. There is a delay of 13 days in filing this appeal. Hence, CAN 1 of 2022 has been filed by the appellant with a prayer to condone the delay.
2. Having regard to the explanation which has been furnished in the application, we are of the opinion that the appellant was prevented from filing the appeal within time on account of bona fide reason.
3. Hence, CAN 1 of 2022 is allowed and delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
4. The appellant has preferred an appeal against the order passed by the Ld. Single Judge in WPA No. 1554 of 2022 dt. 16.03.2022 wherein the Ld. Single Judge had disposed of the writ petition by passing the following order:-
The Wild Life Warden shall ensure that the process of registration and acceptance thereof, under the aforesaid Advisory, is completed in acceptance or otherwise, of the birds registered by the petitioner, preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall not be permitted to trade in the said birds until clearance by the Wildlife Warden
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.