Arup Mohanta vs Union Of India - 2022 Supreme(Cal) 669

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Cal) 669

BIBEK CHAUDHURI
Arup Mohanta – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Subir Sanyal, Adv, Mr. Ratul Biswas, Adv,. Mr. Sagnik Roy Chowdhury, Adv, for the Appellant; Mr. Indranil Roy, Adv, Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy, Adv, Mr.Nilanjan Bhattacharya, Adv, Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee, Adv, Mr. Amrit Lal Chatterjee, Adv, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Bibek Chaudhuri, J. - Affidavit-of-service be kept with the record.

2. The petitioner obtained his post graduate degree in M.S (General Surgery) in the year 2020, subsequently he was qualified for the West Bengal Medical Education Service in the same year and on being selected, he joined as demonstrator/tutor in the department of Urology and Medical Teaching Institution in IPGME&R, Kolkata on and from 15th February, 2021. While working as such, the petitioner also appeared in National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test- Super Speciality (NEET-SS in Short), 2021 for admission to MCH Course preferably in Urology as a first choice and Neuro Sugery as second choice. He passed NEET -SS examination securing merit position 455. As the petitioner has been working under three years bond applicable in the State of West Bengal after passing NEET-PG examination and thereafter MS Surgery, the petitioner did not take part in counseling process for M.Ch course after being qualified in NEET -SS , the reason being that the IPGME&R, Kolkata has only 18 seats in the department of Urology for MCH. The petitioner after going through merit list and the vacancy position came to know that it would not b