IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAJASEKHAR MANTHA, J.
Nilkamal Sarkar – Petitioner
Versus
State of West Bengal and Others – Respondents
WPA Nos. 20733, 20734 of 2018, CAN No. 1 of 2021
Decided On : 10-05-2023
Constitution of India, 1949 - Article 226 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 147, 148, 149, 186, 353, 333, 326, 307, 302 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 161 – West Bengal Maintenance of Public Order (WBMPO) Act, 1972 - Section 9 - Arms Act – Section 25, 27 – Explosive Substance Act – Sections 3, 5 – Protection of Human Rights Act of 1993 – Sections 12, 14, 17, 18, 36 - Offence of Murder – Assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty - Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means – Whether bar created by Section 36(2) has a bearing on power or jurisdiction of Commission - Held, Court is investigation of CID least inadequate and could be otherwise within expression perfunctory – Inhibitions in having to investigate any conspiracy angle that may have led to blaming any police officials for having fired any weapon higher police official ordering such firing into a mob without provocation instance of any person or persons in power allegations in complaint have not even been slightly addressed by CID – Mobs attacking with bombs during agitation first and foremost action from their end would have been to inform Central Government Ministry of Home Affairs matter could be considered or be sent to National Investigation Agency – Writ petitions disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
RAJASEKHAR MANTHA, J.
FACTS OF THE CASE
1. The writ petitioners seek a transfer of investigation into FIR No. 611 of 2018 dated 20th September, 2018, registered by the Islampur Police Station, to the CBI. The said FIR was registered in connection with an incident of firing and bombing at Darivit High School in the Islampur block of Uttar Dinajpur district in West Bengal.
2. On the 20th September, 2018, the students and parents of the said school began to protest against the appointment of two teachers in Sanskrit and Urdu in the school. A large number of posts in various core subjects like Bengali, Mathematics, History, and English, were lying vacant. The two teachers came to join the school on the date. A large number of students had gathered outside the gate of the school after locking it. They were preventing the new teachers and the staff of the school from leaving the place.
3. The gist of the FIR, registered by the Islampur P.S. is that the police received information at 2.05 pm about an agitation started by the students of the Darivit High School. A large number of curious bystanders and outsiders also assembled thereat. GD entry No. 875 was made by the police. Upon receiving information, Inspector-in-Charge (Rajen Chettri), Islampur P.S., along with a contingent of additional officers and police force, reached the school and found a large number of students and about 1000 other persons agitating against the appointment of the Urdu and Sanskrit teachers in the school. The students restrained the police from entering the school. Repeated appeals to the students were not heeded. It was reported to the police that at around 3.10 pm, one of the teachers confined in the school fell unconscious and required medical help.
4. The police requested the students to allow them to enter the school to arrange medical assistance for the teacher, but the students refused. The police force was suddenly attacked by an unruly mob with bricks, lathi, bombs, and firearms. Several police personnel are stated to have been injured. The police too fired tear gas and rubber bullets. Three persons, namely, Tapas Barman, Rajesh Sarkar, Biplab Sarkar, and one police officer received bullet injuries. Several police vehicles were damaged. Tapas Barman and Rajesh Sarkar succumbed to their injuries. Biplab Sarkar survived.
5. Asuo moto FIR No. 611 of 2018 dated 20th September, 2018 was registered by the Islampur Police Station under Sections 147/148/149/186/353/333/326/307/302 of IPC read with Sections 3/5 of Explosive Substance Act, Section 25/27 of the Arms Act (as indicated in the status report of CID, West Bengal dated 08.11.2022) and Section 9 of The West Bengal Maintenance of Public Order (WBMPO) Act, 1972 against 14 persons and 1500 other unnamed persons. The CID, West Bengal, took over the investigation on 25th September, 2018 from the Islampur P.S. Investigation continued over 4 years thereafter by eight successive investigating officers of the CID. Charge sheet no. 860 of 2022 dated 7th November, 2022 was finally submitted. Leave was reserved to file a supplementary charge sheet. The original FIR was registered by the I.C. himself.
6. On the victim’s side, on the 21st of September, 2018, Nilkamal Sarkar, father of Rajesh Sarkar, filed a complaint without naming any persons asking the police to investigate. Rajesh Sarkar was playing football at a nearby field at the time he received information about the agitation in the school. He reached the spot as he was concerned about his sister who was a student present inside the school.
7. However, Sumit Kumar, S.P. Uttar Dinajpur; Rajen Chettri, I.C. Islampur; Golam Rabbani, MLA Islampur constituency, and one Kanailal Agarwal, Chairman Islampur Municipality, were named as responsible for the incident in a further complaint dated 23rd September, 2018 by the said Nilkamal Sarkar. The Islampur Police Station refused to register the complaint. Thereafter Nilkamal Sarkar sent complaints to the Chief Sec
Bimal Gurung vs. Union of India and Others
Bharat Singh and Others vs. State of Haryana and Others
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. vs. Essar Power Ltd. (2008) 4 SCC 755
Ispat Industries Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai
K.V. Rajendran vs. Supt. of Police
Kiran Bedi vs. Committee of Inquiry and Another
Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Manohar vs. State of Maharashtra and Another
N.C. Dhoundial vs. Union of India and Others
Pooja Pal vs. Union of India and Others
Rashmi Behl vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Rubabbuddin Sheikh vs. State of Gujarat and Others
R.S. Sodhi vs. State of U.P. 1994 Supp. (1) SCC 143 : 1994 SCC (Cri) 248
S.S. Gadgil vs. Lal and Co. AIR 1965 SC 171
Sohan Lal Gupta vs. Asha Devi Gupta
Sudipta Lenka vs. State of Orissa and Others
State of Bihar vs. Lal Krishna Advani and Others
Uttam Das Chela Sunder Das vs. Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's duty to ensure fair investigation and prosecution, as well as the power of the Constitutional Court to direct re-investigation in excep....
The necessity for a C.B.I. investigation arises in cases where police personnel are accused, ensuring fairness and public confidence in the judicial process.
If a citizen, who is a defacto complainant in a criminal case alleging commission of a cognizable offence affecting violation of his legal or fundamental rights against influential persons, prays bef....
Investigation can be transferred only in rare and exceptional cases where necessary to do justice between the parties and instill confidence in public or where investigation by State police lacks cre....
It is trite law that Article 21 embraces both the life and liberty of the accused as well as the interest of the victim, his or her near and dear ones, as well as of the community at large.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.