SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1294

JYOTI SINGH
Divine Messengers – Appellant
Versus
Prerna Diwan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. B.N. Sharma, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Mr. Vikas Yadav, Advocate with Respondent-in-person, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)--Present appeal has been filed assailing the impugned judgment/decree dated 09.11.2022 passed by the learned Trial Court decreeing the suit of the Respondent herein for possession of the suit property as also dismissing the application of the Appellant under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC by the same judgment. Appellant herein was the Defendant before the Trial Court and Respondent was the Plaintiff and parties are referred to by their litigating status before the Trial Court, hereinafter.

2. Facts necessary for adjudication of the appeal are in a narrow compass and are captured as follows:

(a). Plaintiff filed a suit for possession, arrears of rent and damages, claiming to be the lawful owner of property bearing Unit No.206, 2nd Floor, Krishna Plaza, Plot No.1, Sector-11, Pocket-4, Dwarka, New Delhi, purchased by the Plaintiff vide Sale Deed dated 20.05.2014.

(b). Plaintiff inducted the Defendant as a tenant and a Lease Agreement dated 17.07.2017 was executed between the parties for a period of two years and the Agreement was registered vide registration No. 5760 on 18.07.2017 with the Office of Sub-Registrar-IX, New Delhi. The monthly rent agreed between the pa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top