IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ARIJIT BANERJEE, APURBA SINHA RAY, JJ.
Managing Director of West Bengal Transport Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The Calcutta Tramways Employees’ Co-Operative Credit Society Limited – Respondent
APO No. 82 of 2022, WPO No. 56 of 2014
Decided On : 17-05-2023
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Co-operative Societies Act - Section 59 (3) - Public Demand Recovery Act 1913 - Section 5 - Limitation Act - Section 14 - Concerned members as per demands of the Society - Defaulted in remitting the amount deducted from salary of employees - Refund the deducted amount - Appellants defaulted in remitting amount deducted from salary of employees of company to credit society for a couple of years and inspite of several correspondences from side of credit society, present appellant-company failed to discharge its statutory obligation and for which several legal proceedings were initiated by present respondent co-operative credit society – Held, Correctness of such statements may be under challenge - Statement of accounts, Society says has been certified by a chartered accountant, also does not appear to be sacrosanct - Fulcrum of the judgment and order impugned in this appeal is the so called statement of chartered accountant. The appellant did not have an opportunity to cross examine chartered accountant. Further, as noted by my brother - One would need to know the date on which deduction was made from a particular person’s salary and the delay – Appeal allowed
JUDGMENT :
APURBA SINHA RAY, J.
Factual Matrix:
1. The writ petitioner/the Calcutta Tramways Employees’ Cooperative Credit Society Limited states that as per Section 59(2) of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 2006, the appellants who are the employers of the members of the said Credit Society, were/are liable to deduct the amounts lent by the Society, from the salaries of the concerned members as per demands of the Society, that is, the writ petitioner, and after such deduction the employers were under an obligation to refund the said amount to the respondent Society within 15 days from the date of such deduction as if it was part of the wages payable by the company under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936.
1.1. Further, Section 59(3) of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 2006 imposes a strict liability upon the employer and the drawing and disbursing officer of the company in this regard by stipulating that if they fail to make deduction under Sub-section (2) of Section 59 or fail to remit the amount to the co-operative society, the drawing and disbursing officer shall be liable to make the payment to the Employees Cooperative Credit Society together with interest at 12% per annum and the entire amount shall be recoverable from the employer or drawing and disbursing officer by the cooperative society as an arrear of land revenue.
1.2. In the present case, the appellants defaulted in remitting the amount deducted from the salary of the employees of the company to the credit society for a couple of years and inspite of several correspondences from the side of the credit society, the present appellant-company failed to discharge its statutory obligation and for which several legal proceedings were initiated by the present respondent co-operative credit society.
1.3. It is an admitted case of the parties that after long persuasion and also after intervention from the court of law, the appellants ultimately paid off the entire amount which was deducted from the salaries of the concerned employees/members of the credit society and refunded the same to the coffers of the respondent credit society. However, the amount of interest which accrued on the deducted amount was not paid and for which the writ petitioner-credit society as aforesaid brought the present action praying, inter alia, for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the appellants to refund the deducted amount of Rs. 14,60,18,794.99 as on 10.01.2014 to the petitioners society together with interest at 18% per annum on the said principal amount to be calculated up to the date of payment.
1.4. The allegations were contested and after hearing both the parties the Learned Single Judge allowed the writ application directing the appellants to pay the balance due of interest at the statutory rate of 12% per annum till April 15, 2022 to the tune of Rs. 16,01,95,890/- to the respondent society as expeditiously as possible by four equal monthly instalments, in default, the entire amount due, as on the date of such default along with 18% per annum interest on the entire due amount, from the date of default till the date of payment, shall be recovered in terms of Section 59(3) of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 2006 as an arrear of land revenue.
Submission from the Bar
2. Mr. Kalyan Bandyopadhyay, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellants, has argued that the appellants being the respondents in the writ petition had disputed the plea of interest of the writ petitioner as aforesaid, but the Learned Single Judge did not consider the same and went on to decide the writ petition directing the appellants to pay the alleged dues on account of interest till such date which was actually not claimed by the writ petitioner.
2.1. Learned Senior Counsel has also argued that there are several documents and orders of Coordinate Benches of this Court recording the objection of the appellants against the claim of interest as aforesaid, but the Learned Single Jud
Bharat Singh and Others vs. State of Haryana and Others
Bhag Singh and Others vs. Union Territory of Chandigargh
Century Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and Another vs. Ulhasnagar Municipal Council and Another
Champalal Binani vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal and Others
Corporation Bank vs. Saraswati Abharansala and Another
Godavari Sugar Mills Limited vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Himani Alloys Limited vs. Tata Steel Limited
Hirday Narain vs. Income Tax Officer Bareilly
Jeevan Diesels and Electricals Limited vs. Jasbir Singh Chadha (HUF) and Another
M/s. M. Laxmi and Co. vs. Dr. Anant R. Deshpande and Another
Municipal Council, Khurai and Another vs. Kamal Kumar and Another
Orissa Agro Industries Corporation Limited and Others vs. Bharati Industries and Others
Popatro Vyankatrao Patil vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Smt. Kuntesh Gupta vs. Management of Hindu Kanya Mahavidyalaya Sitapur (U.P.) and Others
State of West Bengal vs. North Adjai Coal Co. Ltd. 1971 (1) SCC 309
Whirpool Corporation vs. Registrar of Trade Marks Mumbai and Others
The employer's liability under Section 59 of the West Bengal Co-Operative Societies Act, 2006 continues to be enforceable even after the limitation period for a money suit, and the withholding of due....
Plea of res-judicata can be raised in an intra court appeal filed under Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act as in the instant case, even though it was not raised in the writ proceedings by the ....
Failure to apply for defense in a summary suit under the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act results in acceptance of the claims made by the plaintiff.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner bank lacked locus standi to challenge the workers' wage order and was not entitled to interest during the liquidation period. T....
A Court cannot grant an injunction to secure a debt, which is yet to be finally determined, to the detriment of a third party.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.