SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
Height Insurance Services Limited – Appellant
Versus
Reliance Nippon Life Insurance Company Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. A preliminary objection as to maintainability has been taken by the respondent on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction of the Calcutta High Court. It is argued by learned senior counsel for the respondent that the arbitration clause categorically stipulates that the Mumbai Courts would have exclusive jurisdiction, whereas the arbitration shall be held at Kolkata. Hence, it is contended that Kolkata was chosen merely as a venue whereas the seat of arbitration has to be Mumbai, thereby conferring jurisdiction on the Bombay High Court to take up an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, “the 1996 Act”).
2. The Learned Senior Advocate for the respondent, in support of his submission, cites a Delhi High Court judgment rendered in CVS Insurance and Investments Vs. Vipul IT Infrasoft Pvt. Ltd., reported at 2017 SCC OnLine Del 12149, as well as another Delhi High Court judgment delivered in Virgo Softech Ltd. Vs. National Institute of Electronics and Information Technology, reported at 2018 SCC OnLine Del 12723. Against Virgo Softech Ltd (supra), a special leave petition was preferred, which was dismissed by the Supreme
BGS SGS Soma JV Vs. NHPC Limited [(2020) 4 SCC 234]
Mankastu Impex Private Limited Vs. Airvisual Limited [(2020) 5 SCC 399]
Point of law: Where any disputes arise between parties in respect of or in connection with the agreement then parties shall first endeavour to conciliate the disputes failing which the same shall be ....
The jurisdiction for appointing an arbitrator lies with the court where the principal agreement was executed, as per Section 11(6), despite a venue specified in an ancillary agreement.
The seat of arbitration is the place where the arbitration proceedings are held and not the place where the cause of action arose. The courts at the seat of arbitration have exclusive jurisdiction to....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that the court at the seat of arbitration has exclusive jurisdiction over all applications under Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the designation of a place of arbitration as the 'venue' in an arbitration clause indicates the intention to anchor arbitral proceedings to th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.