SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Cal) 1304

SOUMEN SEN, AJOY KUMAR MUKHERJEE
Balai Chowdhury – Appellant
Versus
Sudhirranjan Biswas – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. The appellant is not represented, nor any accommodation is prayed for. The appellant was also not represented on the earlier occasion, when we make it clear that in the event the appellant goes unrepresented on the adjourned date, the admission of the second appeal would be decided on the basis of the materials available on record.

2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated March 29, 2019 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bishnupur, Bankura in Title Appeal No. 3 of 2018 the present appeal has been filed.

3. The plaintiff’s case in brief is that the father of the plaintiff inducted the defendant as a tenant at a monthly rent of Rs.20/- and after the death of plaintiff’s father, the defendant continued to remain as a tenant in the suit premises and the rate of rent was enhanced at Rs.50/- according to Bengali calendar month.

4. In the meantime, the plaintiff developed the suit premises and the defendant continued to remain as a tenant over the suit premises at a monthly rent of Rs.200/- according to Bengali calendar month. The defendant paid rent up to Chaitra 1415 B.S. in respect of the suit premises and failed to make payment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top