JUDGMENT :

1. The appellant is not represented nor any accommodation is prayed for on behalf of the appellant.

2. On the earlier occasion, the matter was adjourned on the prayer of the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant.

3. This second appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18th May, 2017 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) 2nd Court, Howrah in Title Appeal No. 50 of 2013, affirming the judgment and decree dated 28th February, 2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court, Howrah in Title Suit No. 96 of 2011.

4. We have perused the grounds of second appeal and we do not find that there is any substantial question of law is involved on which the second appeal can be admitted.

5. The plaintiffs/respondents filed the suit for eviction, khas possession and mesne profits. One Mohanta Kumar Modak @ Santra was the original owner and occupier of the suit properties. After his demise, it devolved upon the plaintiffs as legal heirs and the plaintiffs became the absolute owners and occupiers of the suit property mentioned in the schedule of the plaint. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant/appellant is a monthly tenant in