IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
Rukmani Devi Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Rahul Gupta – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against eviction suit dismissal. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on maintainability and eviction grounds. (Para 5 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. issues framed and trial court's findings. (Para 6 , 8 , 11) |
| 4. requirements under transfer of property act. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. defendant's obligations for payment and eviction. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. judicial observations on eviction matters. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 7. final ruling to reverse judgment. (Para 23) |
JUDGMENT :
Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.
1. This is an appeal against a judgement and decree dated 31 August, 2019 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Darjeeling dismissing O.C. Eviction Suit No. 23 of 2015.
2. The original plaintiff Khubram Agarwal (since deceased) being the predecessor-in-interest of the appellant was the owner of a shoproom measuring approximately 600 sq.ft. situated on the ground floor of a three-storied building being part of Holding No. 3 in Ward No. 15 of Darjeeling Municipality morefully described in the schedule to the plaint. During his lifetime, Late Khubram Agarwal had inducted one Ram Chand Gupta (since deceased) as a tenant of the suit premises who began running a cafeteria under the name and style
Sevoke Properties Ltd. v. W.B. State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.
V. Dhanapal Chettiar vs. Yesodai Ammal
Nopany Investments (P) Ltd. v. Santokh Singh (HUF)
Krishnadeo Narayan Aggarwal v. Ram Krishan Rai
Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. v. Federal Motors (P) Ltd.
Bijay Kumar Manish Kumar (HUF) v. Ashwin Bhanulal Desai
Maria Margarida Sequeira Fernandes v. Erasmo Jack de Sequeira
A suit for eviction under general law serves as adequate notice under the Transfer of Property Act, thus fulfilling statutory requirements for eviction and addressing issues of maintainability despit....
The validity of a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act is upheld, confirming the landlord's right to evict despite acceptance of rent post-termination.
Court ruled valid termination of tenancy under the Transfer of Property Act due to failure to vacate and non-payment, reinforcing the burden of proof on defendants regarding court fee issues.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that objections to the validity of a notice of termination of tenancy must be specifically pleaded in the written statement to avoid waiver. Additi....
Tenants must not make permanent alterations without consent; violations justify eviction under tenancy laws.
A transferee/landlord can issue an ejectment notice even before the expiry of the statutory period of one year from the date of purchase, and can file a suit for ejectment immediately after the expir....
The definition of 'rent' under tenancy law includes essential service charges, thereby altering tenancy governance based on total payable amount.
A landlord may evict a tenant for personal occupation, if the premises are in disrepair and rent remains unpaid for four months, as per relevant eviction laws.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.