SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(HP) 217

SANDEEP SHARMA
Nicon Ferrochem – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Sartej Singh Narula, Ashwani Sharma, Jannat Duhan.
For the Respondent: Arvind Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP SHARMA, J.

1. By way of instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners have prayed for the following main reliefs:

    “(A) Writ of Certiorari be issued by declaring the entire exercise of taking over and handing over the industry under the provisions of Section 13 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 illegal, arbitrary, capricious, as the respondent Bank has committed procedural impropriety and has desperately failed to adhere the statutory provisions of SARFAESI Act, 2002 and Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 and Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 due to said omissions/lapses the petitioners were forced to sustain heavy losses to the sum of Rs. 1,75,00,000/- occurred during statutory proceedings of taking over physical possession of industry under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 on account of theft/ Embezzlement of goods, material, parts of plants and machinery etc.

    (B) Writ of Mandamus be issued by directing the respondent Bank to indemnify the petitioners for losses sustained by them to the sum of Rs. 1,75,00,000/- occurred during statutory proceedings of taking over physical possession of industry under Section 13 (4) of SA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top