SANDEEP SHARMA
Nicon Ferrochem – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
1. By way of instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners have prayed for the following main reliefs:
(B) Writ of Mandamus be issued by directing the respondent Bank to indemnify the petitioners for losses sustained by them to the sum of Rs. 1,75,00,000/- occurred during statutory proceedings of taking over physical possession of industry under Section 13 (4) of SA
Allahabad Bank vs. Radha Krishna Maity
Bishundeo Narain vs. Seogeni Rai
Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd. vs. Prem Heavy Engineering Works (P) Ltd. (1997) 6 SCC 450
Electrosteel Castings Ltd. vs. UV Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. 2022 (2) SCC 573
Ganga Bai vs. Vijay Kumar and Others
ICICI Bank Limited and Others vs. Umakanta Mohapatra and Others
L. Chandrakumar vs. Union of India and Others
Mardia Chemicals Ltd. and Others vs. Union of India and Others
State Bank of Travancore vs. Mathew K.C. (2018) 3 SCC 85 : (2018) 2 SCC (Civ) 41
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.