SOUMEN SEN, SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA
State of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Fulkumari Paswan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SOUMEN SEN, J.
1. In view of inextricably connected issues involved in both the appeals by consent of the parties they were heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.
2. Both the appeals are arising out of a common judgment passed by the Learned Single Judge in relation to two writ petitions challenging the sealing of the restaurant and investigation initiated by the police station concerned on the basis of complaint alleged to have been forcefully extracted from Saluja. The Learned Single Judge on being satisfied that the investigation was not fair and impartial directed the Criminal Investigation Department (in short ‘CID’) to take over the investigation and allowed opening of the sealed premises.
3. This order is under challenge.
4. Ms. Saluja Motey is the focal point in this litigation. She is supported in her cause by Fulkumari Pasman her present employer.
5. In order to appreciate the order impugned and the respective submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties it is necessary to briefly narrate the facts.
6. Firstly, we discuss the facts of W.P.A.300 of 2019 filed by Fulkumari.
7. Fulkumari is the owner and runs a Restaurant cum Bar under the
Bimal Gurung vs. Union of India
Babubhai vs. State of Gujarat and Others
D.K. Basu vs. State of West Bengal
Jamuna Chaudhary and Others vs. State of Bihar
K.V. Rajendran vs. Superintendent of Police, CBCID South Zone of Police
Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. and Others
Mahmood vs. State of U.P. AIR 1976 SC 69
Mithilesh Kumar Singh vs. State of Rajasthan
Narmada Bai vs. State of Gujarat and Others
Nevada Properties Private Limited vs. State of Maharashtra and Another
Paramvir Singh Saini vs. Baljit Singh and Others
Pooja Pal vs. Union of India and Others
R.P. Kapur vs. State of Punjab
Sasi Thomas vs. State and Others
State of Kerala vs. P.B. Sourabhan and Others
S.S. & Co. vs. Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd. (2008) 5 SCC 772
Samaj Parivartana Samudaya and Others vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Sidharta Vashisht @ Manu Sharma vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Zahira Habibullah Sheikh and Another vs. State of Gujarat and Others
Point of law: Magistrate's power Under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is very wide, for it is this judicial authority that must be satisfied that a proper investigation by the polic....
The investigation must be unbiased, honest, and just, and fair investigation is a part of the constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The power to dire....
No authority can arrogate to itself the power to act in a manner which is arbitrary. It is unfortunate that matters which require immediate attention linger on and man in street is made to run from o....
The necessity for a C.B.I. investigation arises in cases where police personnel are accused, ensuring fairness and public confidence in the judicial process.
The court established that the right to a fair investigation is fundamental, and failure by the police to uphold this right necessitates judicial intervention.
Point of law : There is no more res integra that exercise of power under Section 482 CrPC to quash a criminal proceeding is only when an allegation made in the FIR or the charge-sheet constitutes the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.