IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JJ.
Resham Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others – Respondent
Criminal misc. Writ petition No. 4288 of 2021
Decided on : 01-10-2021
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 147, 149, 188, 269, 332, 353, 377, 427, 504 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 173 – Investigation - Grievous Hurt - Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees - Mandamus - According to the petitioner, in sorting out papers relating to the vehicle from dash board of car, there occurred some delay which caused annoyance to the policemen who started abusing petitioner and his family members and when they resisted, they started beating the petitioner of which video clip was also taken. After beating the petitioner and his family members, the police officials forcefully took the petitioner and his family members to KotwaliPuranpur without assistance of any lady police. Thereafter, policemen disrobed the petitioner and then tied up on a cot and brutally beaten him for two hours using dandas, fist and leg blows, gave him third degree torture and abused him. Sub-Inspector along with other police officials, inserted a danda/ lathi inside the petitioner's anus/ rectum to humiliate him and crush his self-respect and to scare the petitioner for life.
Finding of the Court :
When information of a cognizable offence is received or such commission is suspected, the proper police officer has the authority to enter in the investigation of the same but where the information relates to a non-cognizable offence, he shall not investigate it without the order of the competent Magistrate - A public functionary if he acts maliciously or oppressively and the exercise of power results in harassment and agony then it is not an exercise of power but its abuse. No law provides protection against it. He who is responsible for it must suffer it. But when it arises due to arbitrary or capricious behaviour then it loses its individual character and assumes social significance. Harassment of a common man by public authorities is socially abhorring and legally impermissible. It may harm him personally but the injury to society is far more grievous. Nothing is more damaging than the feeling of helplessness. An ordinary citizen instead of complaining and fighting succumbs to the pressure of undesirable functioning in offices instead of standing against it.
Result : Writ petition is allowed
JUDGMENT :
Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.
1. Heard Sri Arvind Verma, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Jaspreet Singh Rai, Sri Anurag Bajapayee and Smridhi Sharma, learned counsels for the petitioner and Sri Raghvendra Singh, learned Advocate General assisted by Sri Shiv Nath Tilhari, learned A.G.A. for the State – respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief:
b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to immediately arrest the erring Police Officials and proceed against them departmentally as per Rules, and
c) Issue a Writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to conduct free and fair investigation in the present matter and also this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to monitor the investigation so as to secure the ends of justice. and/or
d) Pass any such further order(s) as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
3. Thus, the sole prayer of the petitioner is that a fair investigation be conducted in the matter of incident dated 03.05.2021 with respect to which the petitioner has lodged a First Information Report No.0272/2021 dated 08.05.2021 under Sections 147, 323, 342, 504 I.P.C., P.S. Puranpur, District Pilibhit and the FIR No.0264/2021 dated 03.05.2021, P.S. Puranpur, District Pilibhit lodged by the police. Initially, the police has registered FIR against the petitioner and his family members under Section 147, 149, 188, 269, 332, 353, 427, 504 I.P.C. but subsequently, as per Para-3(xix) of the supplementary affidavit of Sweta Kumari Yadav, Circle Officer, Crime Bareilly, dated 16.07.2021 filed on behalf of Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, the names of the other family members of the petitioner namely Satyendra Singh, Harjindar Singh, Sukhvindar Singh and Rajendra Kaur relating to FIR No.264/2021 (lodged by the police) have been dropped and Sections 147 and 149, I.P.C. against the petitioner was also dropped and now the investigation against the petitioner is continuing for offences only under Section 188, 269, 332, 353, 427, 504 I.P.C.
Facts of the Case:-
4. Briefly stated facts of the present case are that according to the petitioner on 03.05.2021, the petitioner along with his mother and two sisters was going from Pilibhit to Lakhim Pur Kheri to pay homage to the departed soul, namely Karam Jeet Singh (brother-in-law) who expired on 02.05.2021. In the way, they were stopped by the police officials at around 9 A.M. at Anaj Mandi, Puranpur, Pilibhit. The police inquired from the victim and family members as to where they are going and also asked to produce papers of the car in which they were travelling. The police officials who stopped the vehicle and made inquiry, were Sub-Inspector Ram Naresh Singh, Sub-Inspector Raees Ahmad and 5-6 constables. According to the petitioner, in sorting out papers relating to the vehicle from the dash board of the car, there occurred some delay which caused annoyance to the policemen who started abusing the petitioner and his family members and when they resisted, they started beating the petitioner of which video clip was also taken. After beating the petitioner and his family members, the police officials forcefully took the petitioner and his family members to the Kotwali Puranpur without assistance of any lady police. Thereafter, the policemen disrobed the petitioner and then tied up on a cot and brutally beaten him for two hours using dandas, fist and leg blows, gave him third degree torture and abused him. Sub-Inspector Ram Naresh Singh along with other police officials, inserted a danda/lathi inside the petition
H.N. Rishbud vs. State of Delhi
Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. and others (2008) 2 SCC 409
Menka Gandhi (supra), Hussainara Khatoon (I) vs. State of Bihar
Menka Gandhi vs. Union of India
Vinubhai Haribhai Malviya and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Commissioner of Police, Delhi vs. Registrar, Delhi High Court, New Delhi
P. Ramchandra Rao vs. State of Karnataka
No authority can arrogate to itself the power to act in a manner which is arbitrary. It is unfortunate that matters which require immediate attention linger on and man in street is made to run from o....
The necessity for a C.B.I. investigation arises in cases where police personnel are accused, ensuring fairness and public confidence in the judicial process.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's duty to ensure fair investigation and prosecution, as well as the power of the Constitutional Court to direct re-investigation in excep....
The investigation must be unbiased, honest, and just, and fair investigation is a part of the constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India. The power to dire....
The judgment emphasizes the importance of fair investigation in ensuring fair trial as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It establishes that unless there is a serious irregularity....
The court ruled that the investigation into custodial violence must be fair and transparent, especially when police are implicated, necessitating a transfer to an independent agency for credibility.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.